gunnervi

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

ascii nethack is beautiful

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Some of them are. IMO the best are Way of Life, Holy Fury, Conclave, and Old Gods. If you want to play some who isn't a Christian King, such as a Christian merchant or pagan/hindu/muslim king, you'll need to get the expansion for that. Respectively, those are The Republic, The Old Gods or Holy Fury (either will unlock Pagans), Rajas of India, and Sword of Islam. That being said, if you like playing a Christian, Sons of Abraham is worth picking up. Finally, if you're the type of person who really likes optimizing these sort of games, then you'll probably want Legacy of Rome, which adds retinues, customizable standing armies that let a skilled player solve the combat system to punch way above their weight

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

honestly i think having been in on the ground floor makes things easier. its way easier to learn the changes to mechanics you already understand than it is to learn mechanics that were designed to be, in almost all cases for Stellaris, more complicated than the original, already complicated mechanics.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Paradox put a lot of effort into making Ck3 more accessible, and I think largely succeeded. of course its still a massively complicated game, but strategy fans are generally willing to put up with that. its being obtuse and impenetrable and confusing that's the problem

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

3/4 but i can see why you went with universe sandbox; paring it down to 5 words was tough

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Fight on both screens simultaneously

Explore a toybox solar system

Push logic like blocks

Die while climbing a mountain

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

+1 for azgaar's.

A cool tip for generating more detailed continents with it is to generate several maps of smaller regions, stitch them together in your Photoshop clone of choice, then import the result back into azgaar's. You can get a much more detailed map that way than you could easily generate otherwise, and as a bonus you can have broad control over the shape of landmass!

Here's a map I made as an example

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It's a lot easier to have a blanket porn ban to deal with actually moderating porn. And nobody wants to host revenge porn and child porn on their server

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The thing with wikis (actual wikis, i mean) is that anyone can edit them (in principle, at least), and there's plethora of wiki sites out there, and its easy to host your own (well, as easy as hosting your own kbin instance). So federation feels much more purely an organizational change; the only change it offers to the user is the possibility of integration with other fediverse apps. And wikis aren't social media sites, so I'm not sure what the appeal of that is. Do i... see it in my feed when someone edits the "Del in cylindrical and spherical coordinates" page? Is browsing the wiki from within kbin actually more useful than opening it in a new tab?

Distributed ownership of a wiki is definitely a good idea, but i don't see the benefit of it being federated.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Reddit wikis are more about having a static page for information associated with a community than being a wiki proper. For example, music subs that maintain a "hall of fame" in a wiki page, or subreddit rules, or FAQs, etc. Not at all the type of stuff that would go on a fan wiki or wikipedia. This use case is valuable, although there are other solutions to the problem, e.g., sticky posts.

I'm not sure that would need to be federated. Maybe just to lemmy and other platforms with a similar model. But also, that should be up to the other instances, not us. If Mastodon figures out how to show a kbin "wiki" to their users in a way that is useful and makes sense, then why not let them do it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Look if people are getting mad because you're using "they" to refer to someone who has not disclosed their pronouns, then they're being unreasonable. But I've literally never seen that. What I have seen is people getting mad when someone uses "they" to refer to someone who has disclosed their pronouns. And often, this is something that is done by mildly transphobic people who aren't fully comfortable using, e.g., "she" to refer to someone who they feel looks insufficiently like a woman, but recognize that using "he" is wrong. Using "they" in this situation is just as wrong.

That being said, it doesn't help that there's no easy way to disclose your pronouns on this app. I'm a lot of discord servers I'm in, they use badges for pronouns so you can click on someone's username and see their pronouns. But no such option exists here

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem is that the user is necessarily confronted with the technical design of the fediverse from the moment they create an account. "Do I join lemmy.ml or lemmy.world or mastodon.social or kbin.social" can only really be answered by explaining how the fediverse works, because the simple answer is "it doesn't really matter but it also sort of does", which is profoundly unhelpful

view more: ‹ prev next ›