goldcakes

I'm in Australia, the steep sales don't really exist. Shucking still saves me heaps.

This looks like a great study! While there is less interest, optical storage is absolutely not dead.

• You should quantify "used many hours". It's unlikely you will get meaningful results if you test a brand new drive, versus one used for 10 hours. However, brand new vs 1000 hours; now that would be meaningful.

• How will you be storing the disks, and simulating accelerated aging? Poor quality burns or materials might degrade quicker, but not be different initially.

• If there is an easy way for individuals like me to contribute funding, I'd happy chuck in a couple hundred bucks to support.

It's a QLC drive. It literally isn't fast enough to consume 3.1 Gen 1. Sustained writes are like 60MB/s.

Who makes the NAND for it? YMTC QLC are known to fail, but never had an issue with Samsung QLC.