flimsyberry

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Indeed, for me going back to an lts version helped me work around this. Currently on 6.1 and that seems to not have this issue.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Apple enters the chat

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah mooi, dus voordat de accijns terugkwamen betaalden we 'accijns' aan de aandeelhouders?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

De afname kwam vooral door de prijsontwikkelingen van motorbrandstoffen, die verder daalden. Energie, inclusief motorbrandstoffen, werd 21,6 procent goedkoper na een prijsdaling van 16,3 procent in juni.

Weet iemand hoe de prijs van zoiets zo snel zo veel kan veranderen? Verder heb ik niet het idee dat ik dit bij de pomp heb gemerkt. Zie ik iets over het hoofd?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, except the free part

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Ik denk als je zoekt op omafiets dat je al snel fietsen vindt die goed aansluiten op jouw criteria. Ik heb zelf al jaren en jaren een omafiets. Het heeft heel weinig onderhoud nodig.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's a good doggo.

I have to admit that when I saw it as a thumbnail I though it was a jacket

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Ik zou het fonetisch schrijven als buh-nee-dun

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I like it, even though I'm not sure if I would call it the GNOME official workflow (is that even a thing?). I usually don't get close to having 10 applications open. I tend to work with about 1 to 3 workspaces with various applications based on my needs. Furthermore, I keep the windows non-maximized which helps me condense more information yone screen

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I like it, but is it programmer humor?

Edit: typos

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I think that's a pretty good approach. I think it would benefit all to see ChatGPT more like an approximation/guessing machine. It often hits the mark, or even gets really close. Its bigger hallucinations are frequently hilarious.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Chatgpt is not good at these kinds of problems. Heck, any solution and/or answer it gives should be checked manually if you intend to apply it somewhere. It may seem smart most of the time, but you've just hit one of its bigger weaknesses.

view more: next ›