firadin

You're the type of person who would call universal healthcare "socialism", and it really shows.

What point? That you're a corporate bootlicker?

They would rightly be raked over the coals. But they won’t make such a dumb fucking move because it’s a dumb fucking move.

What a wild thing to assert without any reasoning.

By charging 3% instead of 30%? Do you really think their servers cost $8.5b? Does the work to distribute a game and process payment equal 30% of the labor required to make a game?

A more advanced answer would be a cost plus profit model, so if it costs Valve $1 to transfer 1TB of data transfer (in terms of server costs), then charge $1.10 for 1TB. That's obviously very difficult to calculate though I bet Valve has some internal metric of costs.

Valve today does the exact thing Unity was trying to do, charging a percent of revenue for providing infrastructure. Unity got raked over the coals for it.

Me: "Rent seeking is an illegitimate practice, landlords steal money from laborers by extorting them for a necessary good!"

You: "Oh yeah? Why don't you just buy your own land and build your own apartment building?"

You're a dumbass.

This is a thread about how Valve makes over 8 billion dollars despite basically all their revenue coming from an in-game store that sells other people's content. Of course its too much.

Because they don't pay any of their actual workforce: the game devs they steal 30% from for every game sold.