fabio_teixei

joined 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

For email I think the best choice is still M365. It's not free and not self hosted but IMHO it's by far the best e-mail/collaboration suit that exists

 

I have an radarr instance running on my kubernetes. I have configured the IngressRoute to point towards the http port of radarr (Port 7878) but traefik is tring to redirect like an https to an https endpoint that does not exists. See the following:

My deployment yaml:

apiVersion: apps/v1

kind: Deployment

metadata:

name: radarr

namespace: media

spec:

replicas: 1

selector:

matchLabels:

app: radarr

template:

metadata:

labels:

app: radarr

spec:

containers:

- name: radarr

image: cr.hotio.dev/hotio/radarr:latest

env:

- name: PUID

value: "1000"

- name: PGID

value: "1000"

- name: TZ

value: "EST"

ports:

- containerPort: 7878

name: http

protocol: TCP

volumeMounts:

- name: media

mountPath: /config

#subPath: configs/radarr

- name: dados

mountPath: /dados

#subPath: downloads/transmission

- name: data

mountPath: /data

#subPath: medias/movies

volumes:

- name: media

persistentVolumeClaim:

claimName: pvc-radarr

- name: dados

persistentVolumeClaim:

claimName: pvc-dados

- name: data

persistentVolumeClaim:

claimName: pvc-data

My Service yaml:

apiVersion: v1

kind: Service

metadata:

name: radarr

namespace: media

spec:

selector:

app: radarr

ports:

- name: https

targetPort: 7878

port: 7878

type: ClusterIP

My Ingress yaml:

apiVersion: traefik.io/v1alpha1

kind: IngressRoute

metadata:

name: radarr-ingress

namespace: media

spec:

entryPoints:

- web

routes:

- match: Host(\radarr2.domain.com`)`

kind: Rule

services:

- name: radarr

port: 7878

Here is the result on the traefik dashboard:

https://preview.redd.it/u8icie181s1c1.png?width=1006&format=png&auto=webp&s=2f59c702d7b2f631e0f114e73525cac94fb6896c

See that on the servers URL it's point to an HTTPS url, my radarr does not have https configured, so i got an "Internal Server Error" when i try toi access my exposed URL.

On Traefik logs i got the error: time="2023-11-21T22:19:26Z" level=debug msg="'500 Internal Server Error' caused by: tls: first record does not look like a TLS handshake"

Thats because traefik is trying to redirect an https trafic to an http endpoint.

I realy dont know what i did wrong and how to fix this.

Can anyone help me?

 

I have an radarr instance running on my kubernetes. I have configured the IngressRoute to point towards the http port of radarr (Port 7878) but traefik is tring to redirect like an https to an https endpoint that does not exists. See the following:

My deployment yaml:

apiVersion: apps/v1

kind: Deployment

metadata:

name: radarr

namespace: media

spec:

replicas: 1

selector:

matchLabels:

app: radarr

template:

metadata:

labels:

app: radarr

spec:

containers:

- name: radarr

image: cr.hotio.dev/hotio/radarr:latest

env:

- name: PUID

value: "1000"

- name: PGID

value: "1000"

- name: TZ

value: "EST"

ports:

- containerPort: 7878

name: http

protocol: TCP

volumeMounts:

- name: media

mountPath: /config

#subPath: configs/radarr

- name: dados

mountPath: /dados

#subPath: downloads/transmission

- name: data

mountPath: /data

#subPath: medias/movies

volumes:

- name: media

persistentVolumeClaim:

claimName: pvc-radarr

- name: dados

persistentVolumeClaim:

claimName: pvc-dados

- name: data

persistentVolumeClaim:

claimName: pvc-data

My Service yaml:

apiVersion: v1

kind: Service

metadata:

name: radarr

namespace: media

spec:

selector:

app: radarr

ports:

- name: https

targetPort: 7878

port: 7878

type: ClusterIP

My Ingress yaml:

apiVersion: traefik.io/v1alpha1

kind: IngressRoute

metadata:

name: radarr-ingress

namespace: media

spec:

entryPoints:

- web

routes:

- match: Host(\radarr2.domain.com`)`

kind: Rule

services:

- name: radarr

port: 7878

Here is the result on the traefik dashboard:

https://preview.redd.it/q4mru9fz0s1c1.png?width=1006&format=png&auto=webp&s=1934bca3df4cc2b46326dcc091516330d8e8b1bc

See that on the servers URL it's point to an HTTPS url, my radarr does not have https configured, so i got an "Internal Server Error" when i try toi access my exposed URL.

On Traefik logs i got the error: time="2023-11-21T22:19:26Z" level=debug msg="'500 Internal Server Error' caused by: tls: first record does not look like a TLS handshake"

Thats because traefik is trying to redirect an https trafic to an http endpoint.

I realy dont know what i did wrong and how to fix this.

Can anyone help me?

 

I have an radarr instance running on my kubernetes. I have configured the IngressRoute to point towards the http port of radarr (Port 7878) but traefik is tring to redirect like an https to an https endpoint that does not exists. See the following:

My deployment yaml:

apiVersion: apps/v1

kind: Deployment

metadata:

name: radarr

namespace: media

spec:

replicas: 1

selector:

matchLabels:

app: radarr

template:

metadata:

labels:

app: radarr

spec:

containers:

- name: radarr

image: cr.hotio.dev/hotio/radarr:latest

env:

- name: PUID

value: "1000"

- name: PGID

value: "1000"

- name: TZ

value: "EST"

ports:

- containerPort: 7878

name: http

protocol: TCP

volumeMounts:

- name: media

mountPath: /config

#subPath: configs/radarr

- name: dados

mountPath: /dados

#subPath: downloads/transmission

- name: data

mountPath: /data

#subPath: medias/movies

volumes:

- name: media

persistentVolumeClaim:

claimName: pvc-radarr

- name: dados

persistentVolumeClaim:

claimName: pvc-dados

- name: data

persistentVolumeClaim:

claimName: pvc-data

My Service yaml:

apiVersion: v1

kind: Service

metadata:

name: radarr

namespace: media

spec:

selector:

app: radarr

ports:

- name: https

targetPort: 7878

port: 7878

type: ClusterIP

My Ingress yaml:

apiVersion: traefik.io/v1alpha1

kind: IngressRoute

metadata:

name: radarr-ingress

namespace: media

spec:

entryPoints:

- web

routes:

- match: Host(\radarr2.domain.com`)`

kind: Rule

services:

- name: radarr

port: 7878

Here is the result on the traefik dashboard:

https://preview.redd.it/q4mru9fz0s1c1.png?width=1006&format=png&auto=webp&s=1934bca3df4cc2b46326dcc091516330d8e8b1bc

See that on the servers URL it's point to an HTTPS url, my radarr does not have https configured, so i got an "Internal Server Error" when i try toi access my exposed URL.

On Traefik logs i got the error: time="2023-11-21T22:19:26Z" level=debug msg="'500 Internal Server Error' caused by: tls: first record does not look like a TLS handshake"

Thats because traefik is trying to redirect an https trafic to an http endpoint.

I realy dont know what i did wrong and how to fix this.

Can anyone help me?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Do you mind to explain when to use Helm charts and when to use standard deployments? You said that they are useful for more complex deployments, why is that?

 

So, i got my home lab up and running just fine with the usual suspect apps on Docker:

  • Radarr
  • Sonarr
  • Bazarr
  • QBittorrent
  • NZBGet
  • Jacket
  • Tautulli
  • Overseerr
  • SearxNG
  • PiHole
  • Bitwarden
  • etc.

Now i have deployed an Kubernetes cluster. I'm already running Portainer, Rancher and Traefik on this cluster (MetalLB and Cert-Manager as well).
I want to move most if not all my Docker containers to Kubernetes. I know there is many ways of doing that, but using helm will be the easiest way.

Is any of you doing that? Using Kubernetes for your containers? How are you deploying the containers?

I think that using docker-compose much easier than Kubernetes even with helm and if it (kubernetes) was not de defacto standard for conainer orchestration on the enterprise world (i'm IT professional and learning Kubernetes is kinda a necessity), i would prefeer to use docker-compose with docker-swarm-mode.

 

So, i got my home lab up and running just fine with the usual suspect apps on Docker:

  • Radarr
  • Sonarr
  • Bazarr
  • QBittorrent
  • NZBGet
  • Jacket
  • Tautulli
  • Overseerr
  • SearxNG
  • PiHole
  • Bitwarden
  • etc.

Now i have deployed an Kubernetes cluster. I'm already running Portainer, Rancher and Traefik on this cluster (MetalLB and Cert-Manager as well).
I want to move most if not all my Docker containers to Kubernetes. I know there is many ways of doing that, but using helm will be the easiest way.

Is any of you doing that? Using Kubernetes for your containers? How are you deploying the containers?

I think that using docker-compose much easier than Kubernetes even with helm and if it (kubernetes) was not de defacto standard for conainer orchestration on the enterprise world (i'm IT professional and learning Kubernetes is kinda a necessity), i would prefeer to use docker-compose with docker-swarm-mode.

 

So I stopped using Google Photos a while ago when the stopped offering the free photo storage for android users. Since then I'm being using OneDrive ( I already pay for O365 for other reasons and it comes with 5Tb included).

Since I did the migration my home users are struggling with it (wife and kids). There's no comparison on the functionality between Google Photos and OneDrive photos. All the AI features that Google Photos offers are unparalleled on OneDrive, like the automatic face recognition and moments album créations that creates awesome photos collection instagram style.

So my wife is putting pressure to get back to Google Photos, she can't stand OneDrive photos anymore.

I'm trying to exit/cut the cord on all mainstream tech services like many of you on the selfhosted community, so I don't want to get back to Google Photos, actually I want to take the opportunity of migrating out of OneDrive photos to leverage an selfhosted solution but the wife approval factor mandates that I need to be as close as possible from Google Photos feature set.

I was taking a look on some options like Photoprism and OpenPhotos but not sure if any of them are the best option or if even there better options out there.

Can you please help me to find the best option for my use case if there's any at all?

Other than Google Photos feature set, the possibility of SSO auth and multi user on one instance it's a plus, as well not paying for it. If I need to pay for a selfhosted solution in this case I prefer pay for Google Photos.

Thanks for your help

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Don't have any idea on how to implement it IMHO you need to add some kind of support for e-readers like Kindle and etc. Some people read on theirs PCs but the reading experience it's much better on readers devices.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Idk, but is available to download and install

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No problem so far. Working perfectly here.

 

Hello

Low level question. I already have SearxNG up and running.

Now i want to replace all my search engines with it on:

  • Desktop Browser (Mainly Edge but Chrome as well)
  • Mobile Browser (Android Chrome)
  • Mobile Search Bar

I did not found the information on how to do it except for the Desktop Browser that's prety straightforward.
But on the Mobile i need help to se if it's even possible.

Can you please help me?