No. I think that there are enough users with multiple accounts including bots that it wouldn't surprise me if the ratio of active users to active accounts is 1:2.
Initially, yes. They probably relaxed it a bit.
This is my way too. But I default to new and switch to scaled and top-x from time to time.
I think that's a mistake, but also the point is that saying users when you mean accounts is lying to yourself. Users here have multiple accounts, I have 7.
Didn't know about that one. Just subscribed!
Those bots got blocked and banned.
Scaled is intentionally promoting communities with fewer subscribers. It's intentionally demoting the most active posts bt demoting any posts from the communities with more subscribers.
Active accounts is not active users. We shouldn't lie to ourselves. I wouldn't be surprised if the number of active users is half of the active account number.
Rewarding healthy behavior with incentives (attention he wants) could have been effective over the past 78 years. Too bad no one has tried it.
What's the 5 year running total for Meta settlements of this sort?
Credit Reporting business started before the internet existed, so probably not.
The worst consequence is that you get stuck with 4 days of food and water and no one comes through that can help for a week. Cell phones don't work everywhere, maybe a satcom subscription and equipment could help, but a rescue is going to be way more expensive than whatever fines they are issuing.