cstar1996

joined 10 months ago
sorted by: new top controversial old
Can AMD ever catch up to the lead NVIDIA has in A.i/ray tracing? in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

I’m sorry, but that’s not how computer graphics works. Objectively, indisputably, scientifically, ray tracing is more real than raster. There’s a reason movies, artists and designers use ray tracing whenever possible.

Can AMD ever catch up to the lead NVIDIA has in A.i/ray tracing? in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Ray tracing is closer to “the most original form” than raster is.

Can AMD ever catch up to the lead NVIDIA has in A.i/ray tracing? in c/[email protected]
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ryzen caught up first and foremost because Intel stalled. And the driving stall on Intels part was vis a vis TSMC more than it was against AMD.