bloup

joined 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

why do you think the Mozilla corporation losing 86% of their revenue wouldn’t hurt the Firefox browser?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Retrocomputing hobbyists and collectors.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Fun fact the sdf lemmy has an openmw community: https://lemmy.sdf.org/c/openmw

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

See you on December 14th, in 380 years.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

I didn’t do a good job in my messaging, I was agitated. but really I was just trying to say these things

  1. The global banking system represents a far bigger fish to fry, maybe like 100 to 1000 times bigger (it’s quite difficult to assess, but the total wealth held by private banks is frequently estimated to be in the hundreds of trillions of dollars. Compare this to the total value of literally all cryptocurrency)

  2. I probably see a dozen posts that are just writing the same criticisms of “cryptocurrency” over and over again without ever actually addressing why people are drawn to it in the first place, for every one post that’s complaining about banks. despite the fact that banks have screwed over orders of magnitude more people than any crypto bro could ever dream of

  3. When you don’t actually clearly spell out the problems that drew those people in in the first place, and at the very least empathize with them explicitly, all you do is alienate those people and you don’t actually get them to stop using cryptocurrency

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I don’t understand why I wrote that either looking back at your comment. I apologize for it.

as for a common ground: I feel like you’re saying these things because you think that I believe that this person doesn’t feel that way. The truth is I would be surprised if they didn’t feel that way, for all of the reasons you’re saying. I’m literally just saying that nothing they write establishes with 100% certainty how they feel about the global financial system. Like you literally can only conclude that if you’re willing to make assumptions about what it must mean to post this in solarpunk, what it must mean to be critical of billionaires etc.

And you also need to consider that not everyone even understands all of those things. people come here from all sorts of corners of this little fediverse, you need to consider how they’ll perceive this too if you actually want to steer people away from it. Would they be wrong for failing to connect all those dots if they were never exposed to them before?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Thank you for sharing this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

They don’t have to believe that we’re currently living in such a situation to believe that it would be bad whether crypto put us in it or not. I think you’re making more assumptions about their beliefs than you’re stating, here.

I never said how they felt about the current situation. I literally said I can’t conclude from their words. and you can’t as evidenced by the fact that you’re telling me all of the possibilities right now.

because the ultimate powers over currencies are governments rather than corporations.

And I honestly think this is an extremely naïve thing to believe.

And lastly I’m not gonna engage with literally anything that takes for granted the idea that I support cryptocurrency because it isn’t true, so let me just make it really clear: I do not support cryptocurrency

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

Actually if you just take what they’re saying at face value and don’t make any assumptions or inferences about what they must believe, all you can conclude is that they don’t believe that we’re currently under the control of a Tyrell-esque corporation, and that it’s going to be cryptocurrency that gets us there. But personally I think that’s highly naïve and I do think we’re currently living in a global financial system which might as well be controlled by the Tyrell corporation

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I’m only responding this to point out that I never said that it was preferable to the current banking system.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago (6 children)

I’m a little confused by your response. What gave you the impression that I thought there was anything positive about what the author wrote?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (8 children)

It’s just the vibes i get after seeing the 30th mini essay with the same exact content as this, in which nobody ever actually acknowledges any of those problems as being real nor ever proposes a better idea. I guess it literally doesn’t try to convince me they aren’t real problems, but you sure can’t conclude from anything the author has written that they think they are real problems.

view more: next ›