I am sorry but this is too funny. "If I have a dollar for every time I accidentally drive into a tornado I'd have $2. Which isn't much, but it's weird that it happened twice"
bitfucker
joined 10 months ago
Yeah, but in the context of flatpak isn't the distribution managed by the developer themselves? Also, in the distro release version case, they usually add something distro specific to differentiate it.
This is why semver is a thing. If a program is released under 1.1.x, and then recompiled with a new compiler, then it can be 1.1.y where y > x
This also highlights the problem of extrapolating from a single data point.
Man, I miss the ork communities
Yeah, no. The commenter has stated actual child, not cartoon one. It is a different discussion entirely, and a good one too. Because artwork is a part of freedom of expression. An artwork CAN be made without hurting anyone or abusing anyone. We fully know that a human has creative capabilities to come up with something without having those actual something exist beforehand. It implies that humans can come up with CSAM without ever having seen a CSAM.
What he probably means is that for a "photo", an actual act of photography must be performed. While "artwork" can be fully digital. Now, legal definition aside, the two acts are indeed different even if the resulting "image" is a bit-by-bit equivalent. A computer could just output something akin to a photograph but no actual act of photography has taken place. I said the legal definition aside because I know the legal definition only looks at the resulting image. Just trying to convey the commenter words better.
Edit to clarify a few things.
I wanna know if this applies to copyrighted content as well. For example, if by any chance a whole ass book was outputted by a LLM, does the output retain the original copyright?
It would be funny if that happens since the EU is having problems with Russia too. Will Russia help the EU (by proving that America is not as powerful as they'd like to think) or take advantage of the situation I wonder.
Seriously asking, what is The Pack community? I've seen their memes are basically like this and talking in CAPS.
Well, both ways are a valid shitpost. Congratulations! You made a palindrome shitpost!
For facebook and big corporations, you usually agree to the ToS/EULA before you actively using their services. The clause there usually protects their ass by stating you give them the license to basically do whatever the fuck they want. Sometimes even giving up the copyright entirely, like some CLA when contributing to open source projects.
But lemmy, as far as I remember, don't have such term. So it is an interesting question since if the instance doesn't impose a legal requirement for you to give the instance a license to do anything besides storing and serving it verbatim (like many other user-content sites. deviantart comes to mind since the user can license their image iirc). And yes, words or a string of words can be copyrighted and licensed because we do have protection for books and other text material.