auraithx

joined 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 38 points 4 days ago (34 children)

We know they're war-criminals. There's still a difference between that and leveling the place for a hotel. Trump gleefully accepted $100m from Adelson for the west bank.

Stop assuming we're pro-dems and not just anti-trump.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Nah they just want to Elysium us before their wealth gets redistributed

https://www.vcinfodocs.com/what-is-the-network-state

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Hence weighted by reputation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

*for the better option.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

Idk. Ban from communities after negative karma threshold with an automatic vote weighted by users subreddit karma to appeal? Just the first thing that popped to mind though sure there’s better ways. Matrix was working towards something iirc last i checked.

As it stands you can get blocked for life from a significant portion of lemmy for saying Trump is worse than Kamala would’ve been.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

What a daft thing to say. Shove your shill gambit up your arse ya troglodyte and grow a spine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

I am a leftist, not a liberal. IDK what the liberals are doing or why you're telling me. I'm pretty sure they stole the election - but the narratives equating Trump/Kamala on Palstine certainly contributed to lower-turnout and apathy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (7 children)

Brother I have done plenty.

And they aren't mutually exclusive. You should be doing the other things AND voting for whatever party is most aligned with your views that has a chance of winning.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago

I'm Scottish not American.

And bad faith how, this guy has based his identity around Chomsky who agrees with what I'm saying. He is arguing in bad faith 'Are you sure you’re an anarchist?' lol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (9 children)

No that is your logic. You'd be pro-supporting-the-lesser-genocide. There's no lesser option that is available beyond your choice. There is for someone who abstained, so their position actively supported exacerbating the genocide.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I wouldn't use any of those other features. I just browse by top all 1/6/12 hr (which piefed lacks) and the theme isn't great either.

How does it offer either of those things? I see an 'attitude %' on hover, and it says it has 'strong moderation tools'. But I mean 100% community run. Subscribers have to vote on bans or something. And proof of personhood verification tests.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (7 children)

Yeah there was still problems with the admins. But 95% of the problems people encountered day-to-day and what killed discussion and the vibe was virgin subreddit mods.

view more: ‹ prev next ›