After my previous post introducing Post-Architecture, I received a bunch of positive feedback, as well as enquiries from people wanting to know more. So I figured a follow-up was in order. Feel free to ask questions here as well as on Mastodon!

This post highlights my experience working with software architecture in startup environments. I think the approach is different enough from the traditional notion of software architecture that it may warrant its own term: post-architecture.

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/12807878

This new version provides an easy path to migrate from ESLint and Prettier. It also introduces machine-readable reports for the formatter and the linter, new linter rules, and many fixes.

This new version provides an easy path to migrate from ESLint and Prettier. It also introduces machine-readable reports for the formatter and the linter, new linter rules, and many fixes.

I just had a random thought: a common pattern in Rust is to things such as:

let vec_a: Vec<String> = /* ... */;
let vec_b: Vec<String> = vec_a.into_iter().filter(some_filter).collect();

Usually, we need to be aware of the fact that Iterator::collect() allocates for the container we are collecting into. But in the snippet above, we've consumed a container of the same type. And since Rust has full ownership of the vector, in theory the memory allocated by vec_a could be reused to store the collected results of vec_b, meaning everything could be done in-place and no additional allocation is necessary.

It's a highly specific optimization though, so I wonder if such a thing has been implemented in the Rust compiler. Anybody who has an idea about this?

Just a progress update on a fun open-source project I'm involved with. Biome.js is a web toolchain written in Rust, and it provides a great excuse to play around with parsing technologies and other fun challenges :)

Slide with text: “Rust teams at Google are as productive as ones using Go, and more than twice as productive as teams using C++.”

In small print it says the data is collected over 2022 and 2023.

I have a fun one, where the compiler says I have an unused lifetime parameter, except it's clearly used. It feels almost like a compiler error, though I'm probably overlooking something? Who can see the mistake?

main.rs

trait Context<'a> {
    fn name(&'a self) -> &'a str;
}

type Func<'a, C: Context<'a>> = dyn Fn(C);

pub struct BuiltInFunction<'a, C: Context<'a>> {
    pub(crate) func: Box<Func<'a, C>>,
}

error[E0392]: parameter `'a` is never used
 --> src/main.rs:7:28
  |
7 | pub struct BuiltInFunction<'a, C: Context<'a>> {
  |                            ^^ unused parameter
  |
  = help: consider removing `'a`, referring to it in a field, or using a marker such as `PhantomData`

For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0392`.
error: could not compile `lifetime-test` (bin "lifetime-test") due to 1 previous error

Today I'm sharing a little trick that I like to use to make switch statements cleaner and more type-safe. Happy to hear other ideas!

As part of my Sudoku Pi project, I’ve been experimenting with improving the Bevy UI experience. I’ve collected most of my thoughts on this topic in this post.

I wrote a post about how our Operational Transfomation (OT) algorithm works at Fiberplane. OT is an algorithm that enables real-time collaboration, and I also built and designed our implementation. So if you have any questions, I'd be happy to answer them!