VerPoilu

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

LibreTube is also a good one. Basically an app for piped

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Browsers based on chromium do not have to follow exactly what the main branch is doing. If they want to keep supporting MV2 or support different rules for MV3, they can. Albeit it's a bit cumbersome.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Unfortunately, I think that while ad blockers won't work as well, they will still work good enough that most won't bother making the switch.

https://blog.getadblock.com/how-adblock-is-getting-ready-for-manifest-v3-6cf21a7884f6

https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home/wiki/

https://adguard.com/en/blog/adguard-mv3.html

https://www.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/1067als/comment/j3h00xj/

The main issue I see is the slow update of filters (which require an extension update). This might make YouTube win the cat and mouse game. Where YouTube updates(ed?) their blocking detection multiple time a day.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

Firefox's implementation of manifest v3 doesn't come with the same restriction as Google's. Ad blockers will still work with manifest v3 on Firefox (but not on chrome).

This means that all manifest v3 extensions made for Chrome work with Firefox, and almost all manifest v3 extensions made for Firefox will work with Chrome.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They already support manifest v3, but with less restrictions than Chrome's implementation.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Firefox's implementation of manifest v3 is a bit different than Chrome's, and still allows for blocking webrequests with no upper limit.

https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2024/03/13/manifest-v3-manifest-v2-march-2024-update/

https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2022/05/18/manifest-v3-in-firefox-recap-next-steps/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

It would be crazy expensive to run an attack of this size for years.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

There is no way a DDoS on the website in affecting the crawler. Also, running a DDoS attack of this size costs a lot of money (if you rent the network, if you own it it costs money as lost sales). No one is giving AI control over a DDoS network to just fuck around.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

There is no domain name associated with the IPs.

Most importantly, usually, DDoS attacks use infected devices (PCs, mobile phones, smart fridges, shady browser addons etc...) to get many ip addresses and devices/locations and attack from everywhere at once.

8
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Hello,

I would like to self host either on my machine, or on a raspberry pi. I don't absolutely need to access it from outside my network, but it would be a plus. I have read this page: https://docs.piped.video/docs/self-hosting/ , but I'm a bit lost on how to set up hostnames. Maybe I can use something like DuckDNS: https://www.duckdns.org/

view more: next ›