I already thought this was kind of a sus concept (plenty of silly things you can jokingly hate on people for that aren't "impure skin" which comes way too close to real bigotry) but then you said it's on burggit, the explicitly pedo instance lmao
This shit needs a flamethrower asap
Yup, there's no way they can't just hide specific instances from the list. And they really should. The only explicitly NSFW instance being an explicitly pedo instance is a really bad look. Exactly the wrong kind of early reddit vibes.
the way it is cited
The way that it isn't cited*
That's just not how citing sources works lol
That's really not relevant unless the user mentioned wrote the article. I'm criticizing the article for not citing sources.
Where in the article did you find that link?
Just saying that someone said something is not citing a source. They taught us this in elementary school.
We're truly living in the golden age of farming sims. I can't even play them all. I might try this one though
Literally 0 sources anywhere and literally invokes 1984
Liberal propaganda is so fucking lazy. Y'all realize this is way closer to what 1984 was actually about right?
“People like you” being the pessimistic people that think nothing will happen.
Charlie brown be like "why are you being so pessimistic she's really holding the football this time"
Harvest Moon 64. Impossible to have negative feelings while playing it.
Burggit advertises itself explicitly as a "loli/shota/cub friendly" NSFW instance. (Those words mean little girls, little boys, and little furries respectively) You can see this over on join-lemmy.org