But the energy usage is quoted as peak for the entire venue - which is literally a theater / concert hall. It opened with a live U2 performance. The energy usage isn't just for the displays, it includes all the power for the entire building, the concert speakers, heating/cooling, indoor lighting, any kitchen equipment, etc.
Vash63
joined 1 year ago
Yes it is. It's not in mainline wine, it's been in kernel for a long time now.
It's annoying all the articles are focusing on performance versus stock wine here when basically everyone uses Proton or a fork of it anyway, which has had fsync for years now that does similar performance uplift.
The story here should be that we're getting fsync level performance with fewer bug and it can be upstreamed to wine. There is no relevant performance uplift for Proton users, but I guess performance gets clicks so that's the story all the press are going with.
It's not merged, but the benchmarks are against upstream wine. Proton has hacks (fsync) that have almost identical performance uplift but were not suited to upstreaming.
So basically this will improve "correctness" versus current Proton, not performance. Should fix some bugs and improve compatibility.
Versus stock wine, it's a huge perf uplift though.
What's wrong with the Flatpak permissions system on Linux?
True. So he goes to prison for a few months and then pardons himself? What's the significant difference here?
That's today's justice department. The one that replaces this one with their project 2025 playbook will have different plans.
555.58 works great for me in Wayland. 3090 on Arch with Gnome
Awesome. OBS has never prioritized Linux performance, curious how this will compare.
Knowing Mozilla it's probably done client side (meaning it sends weather data for all major regions or something and the client filters what is needed)
Isn't that what pedophiles do? Any sex with someone so young is sexual assault.
2% and shrinking with every major service that isn't compatible