TinyTimmyTokyo

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

In theory, a prediction market can work. The idea is that even though there are a lot of uninformed people making bets, their bad predictions tend to cancel each other out, while the subgroup of experts within that crowd will converge on a good prediction. The problem is that prediction markets only work when they're ideal. As soon as the bettor pool becomes skewed by a biased subpopulation, they stop working. And that's exactly what happens with the rationalist crowd. The main benefit rationalists obtain from prediction markets and wagers is an unfounded confidence that their ideaas have merit. Prediction markets also have a long history in libertarian circles, which probably also helps explain why rationalists are so keen on them.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Dunno, you'd have to ask Sam Altman.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Why say something in 20 words when you can say it in 2000?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

"Fat people disgust me, but drugs are cool."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If Books Could Kill is great. I believe the first podcast was about Freakonomics, another one of those incredibly popular books based on behavioral economics. They took it apart.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

"TempleOS on the blockchain"

Ok that's some quality sneer. A bit obscure and esoteric, but otherwise perfect for those who know anything about Temple OS.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I was just about over my withdrawal symptoms from reddit, and now this comes along. Thanks a lot, you bastards.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, Behe's one of the leading lights (dimmest bulbs?) of the so-called "Intelligent Design" movement: a molecular biologist who knows just enough molecular biology to construct strawmen arguments about evolution. Siskind being impressed by him tells me everything I need to know about Siskind's susceptibility to truly stupid ideas.

view more: ‹ prev next ›