TheCuriousCoder87

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

How accessible is Lemmy in comparison?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I don't understand how a company as big as Reddit does not take accessibility seriously.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I feel like if a device is designed well there doesn't need to be a tradeoff. Removable batteries and water resistant would be amazing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I really hope someone gets this in front of John Oliver and he makes a segment on it. It would be hilarious to watch 😂

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That would probably be very helpful.

[–] [email protected] 85 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Honestly, they should just force Reddit to replace them. Let's see how long Reddit lasts without experienced moderators.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I will probably contribute at some point also. I just need to get up to speed on Rust, ActivityPub, and the Lemmy codebase first. Lots to learn.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, from my understanding all your traffic still routes through you home instance. If your home instance is defederated, you lose access. You will need to create another account with someone that does federated with all your chosen instances. Honestly, this is starting to make me wonder if I should spin up a personal instance just so I an federate with who I want without the risk of being defederated due to the actions of other members.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

On the plus side, we could repurposed this system to prevent a lot of types of online fraud. You could use a provider to create a online bank account, sign documents, and other things that require identity.

On the negative side, a lot of sites might start requiring it just because they want to know who you are for advertising purposes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Another idea is to actually use mutual TLS. Your browser provides your certificate. That certificate has nothing else in it but your status as an adult. Still have to give a certificate authority your information though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I don't really like all these anti-porn laws. If kids want porn, there are too many leaky buckets they can drink from. Hell, they could just messages pics and videos to each other.

That said, if we are forced to do strong verification, the best I can think of is some sort of mix of the ideas we use for certificate authorities and oauth.

Certificate authorities are really just trusted identity providers. In my solution, you would choose from a list of trusted identity providers. You provide them with all the private information necessary for them to validate your identity. From there a third party can validate information about you with your permission.

The way this workflow would work is similar to oauth workflows people are familiar with for Google, Facebook, and other single sign-on solutions. You go to a adult site, select your provider from a list of trusted identity providers, the adult site redirects you to the provider site, you log in and give the adult site the privilege to verify you are over 18. The browser redirects to the adult site. The adult site would get nothing else about you besides what identify provider you use and if you are over 18.

Now ultimately, you have to give your private details to someone but at least you don't have to give it to everyone. Unfortunately, your provider could potentially keep track of what sites you are allowing to verify your information. We would need strict laws on these providers on what records they are allowed to keep.

view more: next ›