Spotlight7573

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I'm not sure I'm surprised at this point any more, just disappointed. All they have to do is just make a stable and secure platform to run apps on. They're going to run out of foot to shoot themselves in sooner or later if they keep this kind of thing up. Too many unforced errors.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 months ago (4 children)

It should never have gotten to the external feedback stage because internal feedback should have been sufficient to kill the idea before it even got a name due to it being such a security and privacy risk. The fact that it didn't is worrying from a management perspective.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

To be fair to Microsoft, this was a local model too and encrypted (through Bitlocker). I just feel like the only way you could possibly even try to secure it would be to lock the user out of the data with some kind of separate storage and processing because anything the user can do can be done by malware run by the user. Even then, DRM and how it gets cracked has shown us that nothing like that is truly secure against motivated attackers. Since restricting a user's access like that won't happen and might not even be sufficient, it's just way too risky.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Whoops, I mixed them up. It was definitely opt-out before.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, it sounds like it might actually be a useful feature if it wasn't impossible to do it securely and in a privacy respecting way.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The Microsoft accounts are already required (without resorting to increasingly convoluted methods) and I think the hardware for Hello might be too now for OEM built computers, I'm not sure.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (9 children)

I'm pretty sure the main picture on the article is what the revised opt in/out message looks like. Previously it was opt-out with just a message describing the feature with a check box to have it open Settings when you were finished with the out of box experience so that you can look at the options later.

Edit: Fixed mention of opt-in to opt-out, thanks tal.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Another KOReader recommendation here. I typically use it on an eink device but also have it on my phone and it works well.

Looks like for syncing there's a plugin:

https://github.com/koreader/koreader/wiki/Progress-sync

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

https://support.google.com/maps/answer/14169818

Update Google Maps to use Timeline on your device

Important: These changes are gradually rolling out to all users of the Google Maps app. You'll get a notification when an update is available for your account.

Location History is now called Timeline, and you now have new choices for your data. To continue using Timeline, you must have an up-to-date version of the Google Maps app. Otherwise, you may lose data and access to your Timeline on Google Maps.

Timeline is created on your devices.

Basically they're getting rid of the web version because they're moving the data to being stored on local devices only. Part of this might be because they got a lot of flak for stuff like recording location data for people who went near reproductive health clinics and other sensitive things. They can't be forced to respond to subpoenas for data if they don't have the data and can thus stay out of it, so I wouldn't necessarily say it's all that altruistic on their part.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Looks like you can use Ctrl+Spacebar to open the "MenuComplete" function that should show you the different available options. I don't think you can get a direct list of the parameters that have explanations without using something like Get-Help though.

More info here:

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/scripting/learn/shell/using-keyhandlers?view=powershell-7.4

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

Someone has already demonstrated using an off-the-shelf infostealer to steal the Recall database from a test computer. It won't take any special skills or technology for this to be a problem.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure that people were unhappy because it was opt-out at first. Now that bridging is opt-in, I don't think most people have a problem with it and I've seen a number of posts from both sides of the bridge so it seems to be working.

view more: ‹ prev next ›