Of course, because "every organization is less effective than individual" :P
Additionally it's "literally socialism"
SneakyThunder
joined 2 years ago
They don't want to admit it but they are just a few steps away from anarchy.
Pretty much everyone admits it. Minarchist (pro minimal govt) flag is literally ancap with black changed to blue.
Soo the, we got problems to big for one person alone to solve. If we let every fucker do whatever he wants we going down fast. We need inteligente population orientated to something good, organizerd trough democracy.
Free Market is essentially a "continuous democratic process". If what somebody does benefit people, he gets incentivised with profits. If people see no value in what he's doing – he gets losses. And if in the process of " doing whatever he wants" he does any harm to others ge gets sued.
And all of this happens constantly instead of once in a couple of years, without almost any accountability from those who're in power as it works in republic.
I don't understand how Americans practice Christianity that it traumatizes people? I remember hearing from someone else how religion had traumatized him from childhood. Which is strange to hear for me since I've been introduced to Christianity as a child, but don't care much about religion or "hell" nowadays...
Thanks! Not exactly what I'm looking for, but subscribed anyway!
Xiaomi Router 4C with OpenWRT firmware.
It's very cheap and can provide 100MB/s speed, but I didn't trust the original Chinese firmware
It should be scp 294
Maybe something like "default filter list" would make sense. Just make certain communities blocked by default for all users of particular instance. But if someone still wants to interract with them, they could just disable it in settings.
Kinda like the setting for NSFW content, but not porn. (Not Suitable For Self?)
Eating is overrated anyway
First of all lobbying and any other intrusion into fair competition is incompatible with free market.
As for the "rich" — without government enforced monopolies, their wealth is a representation of how much value they provide to society. Which roughly translates into their support by society. A bit like representative democracy, but more decentralized.