When I realized the trickster fox is somehow more trustworthy than the rest. Also ad blockers.
Edit. Tab based containers has also been pretty cool.
When I realized the trickster fox is somehow more trustworthy than the rest. Also ad blockers.
Edit. Tab based containers has also been pretty cool.
I agree in principle, but not in totality (largely due to bad faith arguements). Everyone should have the right to privacy and basic essentials, to carry a glock around wherever not so much.
By talking point, you mean how the US constitution was written and the whole point of the supreme court?
Edit: Until congress does their job and pass legislation on these matters, this is unfortunately how the cookie crumbles.
Also ignoring the web 1.0 webpage, why did Scalia argue that this portion of the 2A can be ignored? Cant the state pass laws to maintain the well regulation of arms?
Right, cause its intellectual to just ignore half of a sentence and the stare decisis that came before. Maybe try something else, attempted insults aren't your forte.
Slavery was always legal and only after the civil war did restrictions come about (you can probably guess what group of people this was meant to target). Ignoring hyperbole, it is a fact that the "well regulated" portion of the 2A was understood to allow for restrictions until Scalia made up a reason to ignore it, again in 2008.
Im not going to defend the way NY is going about it, but to say there is no history for gun regulation by States is ignoring history and stare decisis.
Nope, just don't like brain dead analysis.
How come it took so long if the premise was correct the entire time?
Im glad that we agree Heller was wrongly decided.
Im not familiar with this quote, who said this?
True, but that included the highest court of the United States of America.
Oh no, Mickey Rourke has got a point, but of course came to the incorrect conclusion.