PurplePropagule

joined 1 year ago
[–] PurplePropagule 1 points 1 year ago

I'm talking about purely in terms of ads on the video. Both youtube and content creators want as as much ad revenue as possible but not to the point where they lose viewership because of the quantity of ads. I'm not saying content creators are in the wrong, I'm just saying that they get paid based on ads, so of course they want more revenue. It's just an analysis of the relationship, I'm not pointing blame towards anyone.

[–] PurplePropagule 11 points 1 year ago

Honestly, there is plenty of stuff I'd pay for but I pirate if it's difficult to access.

[–] PurplePropagule 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess the one difference is that I don't think twitch ads are skippable while youtube's ads are. I assume embedding the ad into the video would prohibit that. Hopefully youtube doesn't do that because while the current ad situation is annoying, having only unskippable ads would be pretty unbearable.

[–] PurplePropagule 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, yeah, we can change that, we can be the content creators

Idk not tryna post my balls tbh. Also somehow don't think people want to see them either lol.

[–] PurplePropagule 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Idk if that's even a hot take. It's something I've talked to several people about and honestly one of the reasons I don't think lemmy will end up growing much past its current user base. Too much micromanaging when most people just want to see content that interests them.

[–] PurplePropagule -3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I'm sure content creators will be pissed that more ads are served on their videos haha. Oh no! More money! Whatever will they do? The conversation about ads has two sides where consumers are on one and content creators and youtube are on the other.

While I'd absolutely love for there to be a youtube alternative, they have a pretty much complete monopoly on online video distribution. Hosting all that data is expensive so competitors would need some serious financial backing which would likely put the competitor service in the hands of a large corporation.

[–] PurplePropagule 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Twitch seems to have figured out adblock blocking. Any idea what they're doing that's different?

[–] PurplePropagule 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Suggest that Google pays people to engage this narrative, however, and you will be derided and downvoted into oblivion as if you were a tin-foil-hat wearing maniac. This comment itself is virtually guaranteed to be responded to with a patronizing sarcastic and 100% organic comment about how lol bruh everyone who disagrees with you must be a shill.

Oh hey you put this part in before being downvoted this time lmao. If you think it's worth googles time to be astroturfing on fucking lemmy, you have a couple screws loose lmfao.

[–] PurplePropagule 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Competitors would be great but there isn't another service that comes close to what youtube provides. You'd need it to be worth it for creators to jump ship or at least upload to multiple sites. There hasn't been any real competition in the space because youtube is so far ahead of everyone else.

[–] PurplePropagule 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh no! Someone is going against the anti YouTube circlejerk by saying that it's personally worth it for them to pay for the service. Obviously a paid actor. No one who isn't paid by google would ever dare to express that kind of sentiment on a relevant discussion thread, of course. Lmao.

Edit: Lol I love how you added your prediction that you'd be downvoted after being downvoted, and after I left my comment. For those who didn't see, he edited the comment to add everything after the first sentence after being met with resistance making it seem like he predicted the downvotes and my response. I wish I was being paid to clown on this moron haha. What a sad pathetic fucking loser lol.

[–] PurplePropagule 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I know what you mean. You're talking about an ideal reality. In the real world, people get fucked over when they're fired, and ai will put a lot of people out of work. Before we can get near what you're talking about we need widespread labor movements to ensure worker's rights and to fight for worker-benefited automation among other things. It doesn't look like we're close to being there yet, unfortunately. I just don't see how you can say that automation putting people out of work is moving towards that goal. It just fucks people over because workers have no protection.

[–] PurplePropagule 1 points 1 year ago

I think Hamas took hostages partly for that reason. Any violence that Israel does as a result of this will be felt by the captured Israelis.

view more: ‹ prev next ›