OhTheMoose

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Dude, I've had enough, get your jollies elsewhere.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (5 children)

You are attempting to get me to admit that the meat I eat is from the same factories that torture animals as an admission of guilt. I am not guilty, and I do not feel guilty, because unfortunately that isn't how our society/economy works. I eat what is available and easily accessible to me just like millions of others. And like many of those millions of others, I just so happen to like meat. So yes, I fund the torture of animals, but I am as guilty of funding the torture of animals as someone purchasing an item on Amazon is of funding the torture of warehouse workers.

Just like everyone else, I live my life as best as I am able within my own capacity. I'm glad that you have the capacity to not fund the companies that treat animals so horribly. Someone needs to, and I hope that we can do away with them entirely at some point. But I do not have the capacity for that fight in my life right now, and I am not ashamed of that because I'm doing the best I can with what I have.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

To extend what TheGreenGolem said, what you have understood as "could of" is actually a contraction of the words "could" and "have" into "could've"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

I would be pretty happy about getting my nails done too

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (7 children)

No, my argument for continuing to eat meat is "I like meat". I haven't made any statements about my eating meat funding the animal-murder machine because we're not talking about that, we're talking about how "everybody should be a vegan".

Once again you haven't really read what I said. But this time I'm not going to explain myself except to again say: you don't know me, you don't know my situation, you don't know my station in life. You have no right to place these single-minded assumptions upon me.

Edit: you're not the person I responded to initially, but my point still stands.

Edit2: Ah, I see you're the one who started this thread.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (10 children)

I feel like you didn't really read what I said. I eat meat because I like it. I have no desire to go out of my way to not eat meat. If I don't feel like eating meat with a meal then I won't. I have no internal struggle or "convincing myself that it's ok". I despise the way food animals are treated, like they're not even living creatures, but I feel no guilt in eating the end result.

Frankly you have no right to make such assumptions about my character. You have no idea of my situation any more than I have of yours. If you can be a vegan and be happy, good! I'm happy for you. But I am not a vegan, and I am also happy. Saying "Everybody should be a vegan" is no different than saying "Everybody should run a mile every day". Sure it's a generally beneficial lifestyle, but it's just that: a lifestyle, and it's not for everybody.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (5 children)

Or "How it feels"

I feel like there's been a gradual increase in people saying things like this ("would of" instead of "would've", "apart" instead of "a part", etc)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (12 children)

You're breaking the fourth tenet my friend, but I forgive you because I know you just want what you think is best for people.

Not everybody should be a vegan. There's plenty to gain from eating meats and vegetables, and humans evolved to be capable of eating both. Some day in the future I hope meat is replaced with either fully synthetic or lab -growth meats simply because I don't think any living creature should have to live the way food animals (I forget the word) do currently. But for now I will continue eating meat because I am just one man and meat is very tasty.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Some say they're still playing hot-cold to this day

[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago

All good! "Fell" is the past tense of "fall". Aternatively in some cases you could say "did fall", though in modern English that's usually used as an affirmative to a question about the fallen status of the chocolate (e.g. [which is short for the Latin "exemplia gratia" , meaning "for example"], Question: "Did the chocolate fall?" Answer: "Yes, the chocolate did fall" or "Yes, it did fall").

There are actually other (irrelevant) meanings of the word "fell"; as an adjective in "a fell beast" for example, "fell" means "fierce, cruel, terrible, or dreadful"; or as a verb meaning "to knock, strike, shoot, or cut down; cause to fall" for example " to fell a moose" or "to fell a tree."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

I agree with you, having a new but similar icon would be nice.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago

Oh I don't like that at all

view more: ‹ prev next ›