If you actually go to the site, it explains its reasoning
Which disagrees with objective reality.
Also, it doesn’t say NYT, it’s “The Washington Post”, and it’s not “left-wing”, it says “left-center”
I was giving an example.
I mean how do you even source a claim like that? That said, MBFC messes up a lot. I mean how the hell is NYT left wing?
I mean... Exhibit A: NYT being left-biased and more factual than the Guardian.
I mean we all know how it works in practice but isn't Israel... not a NATO member? Theoretically there shouldn't be a problem with Turkey invading Israel.
And before someone chimes in with people just claiming criticism of Israel is antisemitism, no. It's things like this:
I mean it's a little bit of column a, a little bit of column b. There's a significant increase in actual antisemitism, no doubt about that, but the numbers the media parrots are produced by organizations like the ADL and I believe I don't need to explain why that's a problem.
It shares its reasoning, but its reasoning sometimes doesn't make sense.
It's... Not very reliable.
People in the Middle East hated Americans
*Hate. We still hate America.
Why are they doing that though?
Again, left-center is included under the general classification "left wing", which NYT is absolutely not. Are you being willfully obtuse?