And they still get most everything they want; whereas when Dems are in charge they have to make up obscure reasons (example: Oh Noe!!! The Parlimentarian won't let us do it!!!111) why they can't pass popular legislation.
Mammal
Those silly commies don't understand that you have to bail out capitalists when they fail.
Empty threat is empty.
"Life Coach" is a wonderful job for people with spouses who can support them.
If Biden disagreed with the decision to move the embassy to Jerusalem - why didn't he move it back to Tel Aviv?
Everything else you listed has no bearing on added support for Israel. Also: Israel oppresses Muslims harsher than anything Trump has proposed, and they actively court evangelicals in the US.
Has Biden done anything to discourage that?
Roe v Wade, Energy policy, SCOTUS ... it's irrelevant when compared to supporting genocide.
What, exactly, will Trump do differently from Biden when it comes to the US-supported genocide? More weapons? More money? More political cover?
Consider: As long as Biden is president Dems aren't going to get behind stopping the genocide.
So no. When it comes to stopping Israel's genocide: Trump is an improvement because then at least maybe there will be some change from the Democrats.
I'm not apathetic - I'm realistically describing the situation.
Why do conservatives insist on making the left look so cool?
Thing is: There's plenty Hamas & related groups did on Oct 7th to enrage a population - no exaggeration is necessary.
However, there ISN'T enough to justify a genocide ... especially since Israelis have been torturing Palestinians for decades.
Israel needs to de-humanize the locals to the point where the population can justify an ethnic cleansing. Hence: Ridiculous accusations of using breasts as foot-balls and mass rape.
"Israel offered an evolving account of the incident as the day progressed."
Awesome way to say: Making up shit and seeing what sticks
Honest question from an ignorant 'Murican, with no context about what this controversy is about:
To a Hindu, would naming the lion 'Akbar' kinda be like naming an elephant 'Hitler' in Israel?
Or is this all just a religious/ cultural thing that makes no sense to outsiders such as myself?
Poe's law is an adage of Internet culture which says that, without a clear indicator of the author's intent, any parodic or sarcastic expression of extreme views can be mistaken by some readers for a sincere expression of those views.