MamLaLiq

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Here's mine, a thrifted one called Cheetah. Also round.

cheetah

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Ahahahaha, I just blame them then.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

I'll try Voyager, still noobing around but I'll get there.

Thanks.

edit: nope. nothing. Ah well, new app to play with.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (6 children)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (8 children)

I made a post 5 minutes before this one, an NOS translate, and it was not published?

Well, here's the content of my source https://nos.nl/artikel/2508537-gerechtshof-nederland-moet-stoppen-met-uitvoer-van-f-35-onderdelen-naar-israel

The most important part for me was the last paragraph, in bold.

The Netherlands must stop exporting F-35 parts to Israel. The court in The Hague decided this on appeal. Deliveries must be stopped within seven days of the court's ruling.

"Israel does not sufficiently take into account the consequences for the civilian population when conducting its attacks," the judges wrote. "The court finds that there is a clear risk that serious violations of the humanitarian law of war will be committed in the Gaza Strip with Israel's F-35 fighter planes."

Oxfam Novib, Pax Nederland and The Rights Forum had taken the Dutch State to court to stop the export. They believe the export of the F-35 parts violates the laws of war, because the Netherlands knows that the fighter planes are used for attacks on the Gaza Strip. Undeniable risk

Previously, the judge in The Hague ruled that deliveries could continue. The court now rules differently. Unlike the lower court, the Court does not find that the government's position "that the situation in Gaza is too complex to establish that Israel is seriously violating international humanitarian law."

"The fact that a definitive legal judgment cannot be given at this time on the question of whether Israel is seriously violating international humanitarian law is self-evident," the judge continued. "The court does not give that judgment either. But that is not the point in this case. The only point in this case is whether there is a clear risk that the F-35 parts exported to Israel will be used in the commission of serious crimes. violations of humanitarian law. The court finds that it is undeniable that this is a clear risk."

ps, translated with Google Translate

 

The Netherlands must stop exporting F-35 parts to Israel. The court in The Hague decided this on appeal. Deliveries must be stopped within seven days of the court's ruling.

"Israel does not sufficiently take into account the consequences for the civilian population when conducting its attacks," the judges wrote. "The court finds that there is a clear risk that serious violations of the humanitarian law of war will be committed in the Gaza Strip with Israel's F-35 fighter planes."

Oxfam Novib, Pax Nederland and The Rights Forum had taken the Dutch State to court to stop the export. They believe the export of the F-35 parts violates the laws of war, because the Netherlands knows that the fighter planes are used for attacks on the Gaza Strip. Undeniable risk

Previously, the judge in The Hague ruled that deliveries could continue. The court now rules differently. Unlike the lower court, the Court does not find that the government's position "that the situation in Gaza is too complex to establish that Israel is seriously violating international humanitarian law."

"The fact that a definitive legal judgment cannot be given at this time on the question of whether Israel is seriously violating international humanitarian law is self-evident," the judge continued. "The court does not give that judgment either. But that is not the point in this case. The only point in this case is whether there is a clear risk that the F-35 parts exported to Israel will be used in the commission of serious crimes. violations of humanitarian law. The court finds that it is undeniable that this is a clear risk."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

I really like the Veritasium video.

The ending of Thomas Midgley Jr. feels like some Wes Anderson take, I wish I was there to see it with my own eyes.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I made it into a short hardcore lyrics:

Monotony

(chorus shouted like commands)

Wake up

Hate yourself

Want to die

Sleep

(Bis)

(Main)

How can I (dirty slow guitair/bass like Soundgarden)

Stop this storm of worthlessness

Draining me (again, dirty slow guitair)

Like a powercord cut in half

Too short to hang (yes, guitair)

Electricity sears right through me

And I realise (full crescendo total band)

This is the most fun I ever had

(Chorus again full force)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This looks like a good time!

I like a modern take on the holidays, all that dickens-drivel gives me just high expectations.

This is archievable for me, nice.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Devilman Crybaby, but more in terms of The Discovery Of Heaven.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Also how much you will earn. I was paid a quarter less than my male colleagues (ICT).

80s joke

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I really like that you admit you were mistaken and leave the discussion intact instead of deleting your comment.

I wish this was more 'normal'.

view more: next ›