Kofu

I will admit I was clueless to it until it was reported more and more. Its important that people understand that he is a very very rich charlatan.

All I can say is. I agree exactly with your statement.

Im from South Africa and that was my initial like for the guy (no other knowledge than that he was South African) but as I got to see him more and more, learn about his background, I realised that he is nothing more than the classic South african rich kid or poes as we call em in SA.

Right around the point where he started calling people pedophiles for not letting him do some crazy thing, I saw that poes he always was, since then I have seen him become more and more of that poes.

I hope everyday he loses everything.

Poes is a vagina in South African Afrikaans but its used more of a diss than an the anatomical description, which would be a dis on vaginas at the comparison.

Love your local sapper.

For someone so clever he do make dumb decisions. I don't have twitter anymore and people like me who left are the reason ad aren't working.

"Ahhh, I know. Memberships, Elon you are a god".

Only people like caturd are the type to buy stuff that gives them a fake sense of popularity.

Its is absolutely torture. They feel like can dispense their own form "justice" bro, they have already been convicted they have been punished and are serving their time.

Also pretrial detention is the same? Fuck, some of these people haven't even been convicted and they can't splurt a bit extra on air con?

I smell financial corruption.

Be the first to hide and cry if it happned.

The delusion manifest.

Save a idiot that wanted to overturn the election? Yeah, fuck off.

Show me the mistake in such a case as that? Please id love to see your fictitious case because if you show me cases where the person had a shit lawyer and died because of insufficient council or evidence that had been withheld by the prosecution or bias by the judge or jury based of false information then I would argue that that is a failure of the system through courrupt individual that uses it in inappropriate ways its not intended to be used and not proportional justice that i seek.

Yet again you make a stupid claim "like its gonna bring them back" are you dense? Are you purposely being obtuse? Not sure if you are or not.

Blood lust? Someone call the hyperbole police on this person and yes you are delusion equating my belief in proportional justice as a blood lust for the innocence imma bout to slay? That i would argue is simplistic. Oh so just because I found out what the idea behind my belief is all of a sudden im a petulant immature child?

You are the child in this point, labeling people casting your ideals on them without a serious conversation? Thats your immaturity, not understanding why a person would prefer their child murderer to not exist (and again specific to this case) is a perfectly rational response.

You literally are defending their ability to avoid proportional justice so they can either be "rehabilitated" to leave and possibly commit a much worse crime or spend vasts amounts of money to keep housing the worst people like some macabre collection to leer at.

I seek retribution not revenge. I seek a proportional sentence for the crime convicted of.

This bit got me the most lol Because, spoiler alert, locking up a terrible murderer for the rest of their life will not allow them to murder. But you don't care that innocent people will die.

Ahh yeah they do, people with life sentences don't care if they get time added, they gonna die there any way.... very very simple view there

And if you were paying any attention before you would understand that NO I DO care if innocent people die.

I did and the over cost out weights the initial cost.... in the long run...

Alina Hahaha forgot to tick a box. Only the finest lawyers for trump.

Okay so, do you want to read that article? You can just skip to the conclusion part and the fact check done in 2018, since the article is from 2016...

-------------------------‐ Conclusion Was Dennis Davis correct when he claimed that death cases are more expensive than life in prison?

A preliminary study by South Dakotans for Alternatives to the Death Penalty, examining first-degree murder cases since 1985 that have resulted in a death sentence or life in prison, found that on average, legal costs in death penalty cases exceeded those in the other cases by $353,105.[24]

The study was submitted to the State Affairs Committee of the South Dakota State Senate as part of the committee’s hearing on this year’s bill to abolish capital punishment.[3] The study was referenced by both proponents and opponents of the bill during the hearing, and its numbers were not refuted.

While the legal costs were greater, information from the South Dakota Department of Correction shows the average cost of long-term incarceration for a prisoner sentenced to death is lower than that of a prisoner serving a life sentence. Because there are no extra expenses involved in housing condemned prisoners, and those prisoners are incarcerated for less time in state prison, the average savings per prisoner is $159,523.[19]

Since the average savings in long-term incarceration is so much lower than the average additional legal costs, it appears Davis is correct about the cost of the death penalty versus life imprisonment in his home state.

Because the costs associated with capital punishment have not been studied in every state that has the death penalty, and because most of the existing studies are limited in scope, it is not possible to state definitively that the death penalty is always more expensive than life in prison in the United States. But the studies of capital punishment conducted since the Furman decision do offer support for Davis’ claim.

Fact Check- 1000 x 218 px.png Launched in October 2015 and active through October 2018, Fact Check by Ballotpedia examined claims made by elected officials, political appointees, and political candidates at the federal, state, and local levels. We evaluated claims made by politicians of all backgrounds and affiliations, subjecting them to the same objective and neutral examination process. As of 2023, Ballotpedia staff periodically review these articles to revaluate and reaffirm our conclusions. Please email us with questions.

Soooooo basically, yeah more expensive in legal fees but literally cheaper because they don't spend 40 years rotting in a hole.

Also thats not what I'm talking about... pfft.