HighlyRegardedArtist

joined 4 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

This reads like a desperate attempt at proving to investors that their "AI" is useful for handling factual information, with a hint of plain old corporate bribery to avoid further lawsuits from publishers. Grifters gonna grift, and all that.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

And do some more stock buybacks and raise dividends, of course.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

Careful now, you'll open the door for fElon Musk 2028. We don't want that, do we?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Years ago, you could - I'm not sure what the situation is currently, but it would be extremely weird if they had removed this possibility entirely. You could see if the official command line tool does what you need. At least there seems to be an option to change the password.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 days ago

Ok, great to know. Nuance doesn't cross internet well, so your intention wasn't clear, given all the uninformed hype & grifters around AI. Being somewhat blunt helps getting the intended point across better. ;)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You can play with words all you like, but that's not going to change the fact that LLMs fail at reasoning. See this Wired article, for example.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I have to disagree with that. To quote the comment I replied to:

AI figured the “rescued” part was either a mistake or that the person wanted to eat a bird they rescued

Where's the "turn of phrase" in this, lol? It could hardly read any more clearly that they assume this "AI" can "figure" stuff out, which is simply false for LLMs. I'm not trying to attack anyone here, but spreading misinformation is not ok.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago (8 children)

Or, hear me out, there was NO figuring of any kind, just some magic LLM autocomplete bullshit. How hard is this to understand?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (3 children)

If the reason for you wanting to avoid bitlocker is incompatibility with linux, you might want to reconsider. It's been many years since I had drives with bitlocker+ntfs, but they worked reasonably well back then with dislocker, so perhaps check that out before considering alternatives.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago (5 children)

You might want to remember that he has done more to advance open source software than perhaps any other person on this planet. You don't get to take away someone's achievements just because you don't like them...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can use LUKS for something like this too by mounting a file through a loop device and then using it like any other disk/filesystem. For more details, see: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Dm-crypt/Encrypting_a_non-root_file_system#File_container

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago

Analysts: "Is this 'car' in the room with us right now?"

view more: next ›