GuyFleegman

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

And we're updated! Thank you for your advice, we really appreciate it.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ahh, ok. That's helpful, thanks!

This is going to seem silly in the context of such a severe exploit but one quirk about our instance is that we literally do not have a "general discussion" /c/. The biggest one is scoped to Star Trek and so a Lemmy exploit is obviously outside the scope of ... Star Trek. I would wager that's the main reason the mod removed the post, but I will admit that just pointing this out, I feel like the forum mod from the short story Wikihistory.

I'm in contact with the admins who manage the hosting, they are coordinating an update 0.18.2-rc1 as we speak. Also, there's already been some discussion about setting up a general discussion /c/ on our instance and so I'll include instance security in the scope of that /c/.

You mentioned elsewhere in this thread there is a Lemmy admins Matrix room. Is my instance big enough for my admins to be invited? If yes, who can I point them at to get in?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

This issue is already quite widely publicized and quite frankly “we’re handling it and removing this” is a much more harmful response than I would hope to see.

Hi, mod of a community on the instance in question here. Why is this response harmful? What should we have done instead?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I added English as a language in [email protected]. Should work fine now!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

You're not wrong, but man the Prime Directive would make a whole lot more sense if it did. The commonly misunderstood version of the PD that is intended to prevent cultural contamination is clear and simple. Given its status as the literal top rule, the actual PD—a generalized non-interventionism/pro-isolationism dictum—is oddly complex, vague, and lacking a focused objective.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

there is literally an entire genre of subreddit dedicated to this kind of post

why are you feigning surprise about it?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it's broadcasting "join our webring and sign our guestbook!"

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don’t forget /c/Risa! We’re here too! And we have Jamaharon!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What about Paramount+ is worse than all the other streaming services? Aren't they all hoovering up data about our watch habits? Isn't that the point?

If you don't want to stream it and you don't want to buy it outright, I don't know why you're asking us to tell you what the only remaining option is, matey.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Ah. Tuvix was a person, EvilKirk was not?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

To point one, yep, fair. I've unceremoniously dropped "The Enemy Within" into a context it was never intended to be examined from.

To point two, I agree that Janeway was both the source and the termination of Tuvix' personhood, but I don't see the relevancy. What bearing does Tuvix's personhood have on how we describe Janeway's actions, or the discussion about whether those actions were justified?

view more: ‹ prev next ›