GivingEuropeASpook

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

All they care about is their base

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

But it isn't the same as if the entire working class had a collective say in the capital, not just those who choose to and have the resources to pay in. It isn't the same as the workers of that company having a say in their working conditions, shift lengths, compensation, etc.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

A better way to say it would instead be the inverse: "If you don't work for a paycheck, you probably hold enough capital"

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago (9 children)

They want a shutdown lol this idea that negotiating will avert it is silly since you don't negotiate for things you don't want.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Captured implies that the State didn't already function as a tool of capital

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

All this because Republicans in the US don't like that sending arms to Ukraine makes Biden look good to the general public.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

I know, I was joking

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Yes, although the US pulled itself back enough with some of FDR's reforms that it kicked the can down the road a few generations, whereas the Weimar Republic actually collapsed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

I know right? This quote in the headline makes her out to sound so tepid like "please mr president could you maybe be more confrontational against the fascists who want to kill me and my allies? 👉👈"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

Too busy trying to court centrist voters and uphold a dying status quo

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Nah if Trump was in office in the last four months there'd be open conflict across the Middle East with thousands of US troops bound for Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran, Jordan, etc

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Oh yeah, if he started talking like half of his most rabid supporters do online then he'd be way more popular.

If people could quote President Biden's personal attacks on white supremacists, book bans, etc then they'd get a lot farther with the politically disengaged.

Imagine if you had Biden (or his social media team) out here on the daily constantly mocking GOP culture war shit as inherently un-American and out of touch with normal people?

 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/7791489

Key takeaway from the article for me was this paragraph:

"The stark reality is now inescapable: legislations targeting the medical care of transgender adults have taken root, despite the claims of anti-trans activists that they are trying to “protect children” with these laws. Florida's new provisions represent the first significant restrictions on trans adult care to fully materialize."

 

The headline should read something more like "Florida students to return to schools after fascist-overhaul of the curriculum" but that wouldn't be "objective" enough for NPR.

Students will literally be watching Prager U Kids videos, require parental permission for a nickname, and be forcibly misgendered by even their closest, favorite, teacher as a matter of State Law.

 

Lawmakers across the country (United States) are trying to protect kids by age-gating parts of the internet.

 

The project has been delayed for years, but perhaps with Amtrak (and Andy Byford), the line will finally progress.

 

From the article, my emphasis added:

"Bills targeting the LGBTQ+ community remained stagnant for the initial months of North Carolina's legislative cycle. However, the landscape shifted when Democratic Representative Tricia Cotham, elected from a district which voted for her,** a Democrat, by +19points, switched to the Republican party**. This gave the GOP the crucial 72 votes required to override a governor's veto. Subsequently, these bills were promptly slated for hearings and aggressively advanced by the state's Republican leadership."

 

Sexualisation is hardly new - nor is it a dogma. A dogma is an insistence about certain things being unequivocally and unquestionably true - "sexualisation" isn't something that can be true or false since it's an abstract concept.

tl;dr: THE QUESTION: what context am I missing in regards to sexualisation as a "new and odd dogma?" Why?

 

One of my favourites from Alan Fisher. Seriously, just one more lane bro!

view more: next ›