FringeTheory999

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

then they should create their own competing distribution. They aren’t actually making any ambient soundscapes. not even white noise, let alone rain, wind, birds, crickets, etc. And what about all those copies of “which side are you one boy” and it’s many covers. you could make the same argument for any traditional music, but you’re not. You only care about “white noise” because you consider it to be low effort. Low effort is not no effort, and the people that put in the effort to create those files should be paid.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

so, you don’t believe that people should profit from the redistribution of public domain works? I think the entire publishing industry would have something to say about that. Considering the amount of non-copyrightable/public domain material that is bought and sold commercially every day. That’s a pretty funky belief you’ve got there.

You’re right, spotify could release a competing distro, yet they aren’t.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (5 children)

No one should care about a spotify exec. This includes their parents and wife. Everyone who creates audio projects for spotify should be paid. This includes musicians and creators of ambient noise tracks. People like those tracks, they are popular, they should be paid. It's not a difficult concept. Make a product. Distribute the product. Get paid for the product. You perception of the products relative value compared to other disimilar products in the same file format, is about the least relevant thing in the world. Even if you don't think the product represents enough "effort" to be considered equal.

All of this is crazy.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (9 children)

What problem? There was never a problem.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

That is not the scenario I described, but it is imaginative. I'll give you that. Here, let an old chinese guy explain it to you...

“If your enemy is secure at all points, be prepared for him. If he is in superior strength, evade him. If your opponent is temperamental, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant. If he is taking his ease, give him no rest. If his forces are united, separate them. If sovereign and subject are in accord, put division between them. Attack him where he is unprepared, appear where you are not expected .” ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War

Or as I like to paraphrase it "Don't give anyone the fight they came looking for. Give them a different fight".

Now go be dumb somewhere else.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So, no change then. This is as it has always been. You can take AI elements chop them up, recombine them, and have copyright over the result, but you can't say "Show me a picture of waffles" in your prompt and expect the resulting waffles to be copyrightable.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Congratulations, you have won a coupon for one free semantic argument. You can exchange this coupon for one semantic argument, which will go unchallenged. You may also exchange this coupon for one saltine cracker, slightly stale but most likely still edible.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You should look up all the companies that failed to do that, then look up survivorship bias.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

So what? They wouldn't be bitching if people didn't want that kind of content. Most media is junk. I don't really see how this is unique?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (7 children)

If someone challenges you to a fist fight, don't fist fight them. They want you to fist fight them because it gives them advantage. They've trained and prepared for fist fights their entire life. You are doing them a favor by fighting them by their rules. You have to fight them on your terms, playing your own game. Whatever your game is, that's the way you have to face them. harrass, sabotage and disrupt. Failing that, guillotines are a very fun game indeed.

taking on a business, with business is like wresting a pig. You'll both get dirty and the pig likes it.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Because it's idiotic and non-actionable. I didn't down vote him though. I say go ahead and try it, see how far you get. John Deer has lots of money, it's not like they wouldn't act to stop you. They'll sue you into oblivion and they won't even need a case with merit to drive your little startup into the ground. They'll just outspend you, not to mention they'll have consolidated supply lines that you'll need and that they will not share. The first rule of capitalism is that competition is not to be tolerated.

view more: ‹ prev next ›