Ebby

1 in 75? That math seems pretty off.

40,000 fatalities would be a sample size of 3 million. The USA is 335 million, 110x larger.

1 in 8,250 is more like it.

Ha, I get it. Lots of stuff here is posted super seriously. It's easy to incite this community where it spills over into others.

I suppose the joke part of this didn't sink in. I refer to my earlier comment about lack of coffee. :)

First of all, the ISP controls cable modem firmware. They have all the settings and manage the device. You don't get much control there.

As for your question, I'd say no, for 2 reasons. First, designing that capability is expensive and modems are built for cheap reliability. Second, any hardware to spy is more useful installed in a data center accessible to their user base. There is not much point installing unnecessary tech to one endpoint.

As for router, they are beefier CPU-wise. AT&T has in the past prevented users from changing DNS settings and that could lead to lots of tasty data. Deep packet inspection is becoming more prevalent in home routers as is integration with other technologies. (EERO devices for example).

Make sure to fire up a VPN or something when you need.

The user may not be aware they have this tracking technology on their phone. The toolkit may be some app developer integrating a 3rd party library for analytics. Banking apps, loyalty apps, phone companies, games, utilities... they all can rely on 3rd parties for proximity services.

In fact, I was going to mention an app, Exodus, that can reveal these trackers and in scanning my phone, I found 2!. The first is home assistant, which is understandable, but the second is a Health app my doctor office uses! Man, that irks me!

Uhhh that exact technology has been in use for years. Your phone broadcasts/receivers a beacon at regular intervals while Bluetooth is on. Anyone can pick it up if they are looking.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/06/14/opinion/bluetooth-wireless-tracking-privacy.html

The process is so streamlined companies bragged your advertising profile is updated before you check out.

The Next Major Version of Bluetooth Might Help Advertisers Track Your Smartphone Faster

FIFY

Let's not pretend this feature didn't trickle down the data harvesting dog-hydrant to us peons solely for our benefit.

For drive power?

An alternator can charge a battery and run accessories, but given 1 horsepower is roughly 730 watts, you really need some high voltage system to keep the magic smoke in.

Edit: maybe we're talking different things. Honda used to integrate electric motors directly to engines in their early hybrids. Ford, iiiiif I recall, combine engine and electric power in the CVT transmission.

Both can use the EV motor as a massive alternator, but a standard alternator is simply too small, and attached to the engine too weakly, to generate the power of a hybrid.

I'm going to say no, though I don't actually know for sure.

I imagine any accessory belt driven alternator/generator/motor setup would have practically meaningless value towards torque or economy; limited by the friction available from the belt.

Edity edit: just saw your vid. Well call me Sally, there is something like that. Yeah, that belt had to be massively upscaled!

Haha yeah. Don't get me wrong, driven a car with that. What a great experience. And shifting faster then I can is definitely A-OK in my books.

I just... like the nostalgia of manual. It's tactile; you're meshing with the machine. I do like paddle shifting though.

It's really not that much of an issue anymore. Some electric can beat out turbo 4's in horsepower, but that battery is like dragging 1/3 of an extra car in the turns. It can do it, but you can feel the weight. That said, you ain't doing laptimes on a hill climb so it may not matter whatsoever.

Personally, I enjoy those rare things called a manual transmissions, so that limits my selection range, but I feel my next car won't have one.

I will point out that 3rd party customizing options has been a factor in my decisions in the past. To date, I haven't seen much EV-wise. I'd like to see more of that in the future though.

Oh yeah, the question ... If you got the cash to throw at it, I may go for fun EV, otherwise turbo 4. There are great cars in both columns.

Straight up, Firefox isn't search, so that's never going to be competitive. Changing from Google is easy though. That aside though ...

Comparing Firefox to Chrome is a little complicated as it comes default on pretty much all Android phones. Yes, we can change, but it's still installed and running services in the background if I recall. I really hope the move away from useful extensions takes a toll on chrome and brings users over to Firefox.

Million dollar salaries are excessive IMHO and rarely justified. I'm with you on that.

Some things Mozilla does, and doesn't do, have been instrumental in not only bringing awareness, but security for the web and triggering dialogue. That openness is important and not something Google has been known for.

Google may be covering their butt funding Firefox, but an Internet without Firefox may look much different today.