Braydox_ofAstroya12

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why the distinction? Yes if you choose to be a nazi then you're a nazi.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Almost like people treat politics like a sport.

Go red team

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If you're being forced to be a thing then you arent really that thing

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Alive yes.

Well? Fuck no lol. What is your definition of well? You specified the US. What policy,government institutions, organisations,condone white surpremacy? The closest thing you have that promotes white supremacy is critical race theory an idea that white people are inherently superior thus the need to uplift other races. A pretty awful thing to be sure but that is being met with widespread condemnation and active suppression. So another loss for WS.

As for showing their allegiance uh yeah thats always been a thing. You can go back ever further then 30 years when America had an actual nazi party. They didnt get very far cause ya know nazi's

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (6 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

"I don’t think it was designed by Larian intentionally to be antisemetic, no. Which I said in my first comment. It’s that the trope they used of the “hook-nosed witch” (and that steals babies!) has antisemitic roots. It’s just it’s so engrained in western culture most folks don’t realize at all where the image came from. I don’t at all think Larian did it maliciously or consciously."

Its a false conclusion to assume a commonly known ugly trait has only one source especially when other cultures that had no jewish cultural connections have similer concepts. A single charaicacture doesnt have a monopoly on character traits. Especially when mythology like the hag and witches existed before the jewish chararicture existed.

"And as for where I expected the conversation to go, well, I don’t engage in conversations where someone is being aggressive or completely dismissive of another point of view. It’s a waste of time and I don’t fight with angry randos on the internet. I have better things to do."

Yeah thats fair im being fairly dismissive since i find the premise of the argument inherently ridiculous as the only way to come to this conclusion to cherry pick history and ignore everything else. This position is Commonly held by historical revisionists and grivence studies enthusiasts. To put it another way i view people who hold this position to be in the same league as flat earthers and alien conspiracy theorists.

So you are correct to walk away.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

Couldnt resist.

But as for serious answer. The reality of premise posed by the post doesnt exist. People still consider Nazis to be bad. It just in this day and age the label nazi has become watered down and redundant. As for Actual nazi's which the closest we have to are currently North Korean,Chinese and russian governments.

So going by the premise the person thinks nazi's are a problem when chsnces are what he thinks are nazi's arent actual nazi's but people they dont like for reasons that arent nazi related but feels strongly about theu feel the need to make the comparison to poach the anger and concern reserved for that label and place it on their source of hate

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Humanity without the vineer of filter of irl consequences

view more: ‹ prev next ›