Yeah, but you don't actually check any it the citations, nobody who cites Wikipedia does.
You didn't even say which part of the Wikipedia articles you were citing
Yeah, but you don't actually check any it the citations, nobody who cites Wikipedia does.
You didn't even say which part of the Wikipedia articles you were citing
It's not just as bad though, you're just a chauvinist.
The CIA (and similar organisations) prop up the international economic order of grossly unequal exchange with the global south that allows European social democracies to exist. The point is that liberals will point to European Social Democracies as a model to emulate, without realising that they can only exist by offshoring so much of their economy to the global south.
If you're going to try to cite a claim, please don't just drop the Wikipedia pages on the subjects. In fact, don't cite Wikipedia at all.
You were, and are, being deliberately disingenuous.
Case in point
You're really demonstrating why it's easier to just remove comments like yours rather than try to disprove them when you're just going play Calvin Ball and argue in bad faith
You really pissed off the .world neolibs with this one. Good work.
You would consider all of them "tankies" if they were around today
As a libertarian I have no problem with communism as Marx envisioned it: people spontaneously sharing because they feel like it.
Where do you get this nonsense?
Least incoherent .worlder
You're literally in a .ml com.