ArsFireside

Okay.

Well, if you actually ever support someone, and they appear to be a bad person, you should know you paid them for their art style adding to not knowing they were a bad person, so you're not actually guilty. Also, even that person deserves a possibility to become better and start over, and thus, they shouldn't be cancelled. That's what we both know, am I right?

What happened to Alec Holowka is a pretty blunt and cruel example.

Well, it is controversial, unfortunately. I never understood the logic behind calling piracy a theft, because nothing actually gets stolen, only copied.

Digital piracy not being an immoral crime (or crime at all) and not making one a horrible person.

If anything, that was just an answer to the topic question, I don't have anything about anyone's human rights. Ah, by the way, I forgot! Of course! What I said also includes the necessity to explicitly state your words aren't deliberately harmful if they can be seen as such by someone. (Again, it's just an answer to the topic, I don't bear any harmful intentions to anyone.)

Social Justice Warriors forcing their agenda and worldview into languages, movies, books, and games, and cancelling everyone who did something regrettable in the past.

Okay, thank you for your answer! I appreciate it!

Indeed, it is. But I wouldn't ask it if I weren't interested.

I know, I know.

Thank you for the answer! I think it really does make sense, so I appreciate your answer.

Yes, we're talking about humans here.