AVincentInSpace

joined 11 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Who is the man then?

So help me God if you say Biden

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If you're being serious, the comic My Mate is really quite good (assuming you're into gay furries). It's about a budding relationship between a fox named Farin and a dragon named Sekk'ral, and the trials and tribulations of an interspecies relationship, Farin being taught his whole life that dragons are ruthless killers and his reaction when he meets one that really is as kind as he first appears, keeping their relationship secret from the fox tribe, Sekk'ral's duties as the prince of the dragon kingdom (which he does not want to perform), and many other dragons in that kingdom who are exactly as ruthless as Farin has been told and will stop at nothing to ensure Sekk'ral's arranged marriage goes through. Most of the time, though, it's really quite wholesome.

If Pokémon strike your fancy, Blazing a Trail is also quite plot heavy (while containing significantly more sex scenes). It's about a budding young trainer and her Fennekin, who is initially frustrated with how little progress she's making in terms of battle ability despite her trainer's encouraging, judgement-free attitude, until one day she gets dropped off at the daycare and ... discovers exactly what Pokémon do there that causes them to level up so quickly, and how much she likes doing it. This one is a lot... heavier than My Mate, and in the later chapters deals with themes of sexual assault. At one point, while the trainer is eating dinner, one of the Pokémon belonging to a gym leader they've been stuck on for ages sneaks up to the Fennekin (unbeknownst to her trainer) and offers to throw the match in exchange for... letting him have his way with her. She tries to refuse, is quickly overpowered, and is rescued in the nick of time by another Pokémon she'd met earlier.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

I'm feeling a terrible urge to become a script kiddie.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I changed my DNS to quad9 and that fixed it. Wild.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago

He was a Windows boy, she said see you later boy

Yeah that definitely flows better

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

If you use the browser version of Zoom, it would have no way to know

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm sorry, driving to his house, shooting him in the head, and setting his house on fire is "twenty minutes of fun"?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (4 children)

OP should consider screen-recording her zoom calls.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Why would I be lying to myself? I haven't seen any evidence that porn is in any way detrimental if used in moderation, and keeping things taboo is exclusively harmful for everyone involved. If, someday, I have a child, and that child comes to me telling they feel guilty for watching porn (because they don't have a real romantic partner and feel guilty about that, because they read that porn rots their brain, because of puritanical bullshit like this post, etc. etc.), I would of course assuage their fears and tell them there's nothing to be ashamed of. Once you get to a certain age, jerking off is as natural and as necessary as going to the bathroom, and if porn helps you do that then I fail to see the problem.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I clicked through to their article on Conservapedia because I was curious what they had to say about it and

Conservapedia, also known as "The Trusworthy [sic] Encyclopedia", is essentially an American-exceptionalist and dominionist group blog, disguised as a half-functioning wiki. The website was created by God-King Andrew Schlafly in 2006 because of his belief that Wikipedia is deceitfully riddled with "liberal bias" and “atheist bias,”[note 1] because apparently the best way to solve real or imagined bias is to create a website that is biased in an opposite way. The vast majority of articles go out of their way to blame pretty much everything negative on "liberals" (which they use as a catch-all snarl term for anyone and everyone who disagrees with them on just about any given issue — which happens to be everyone),

I have to say I find it kind of funny that a site calling itself "RationalWiki" would use language like this. I have my doubts that it is possible to violate Wikipedia's "encyclopedic tone" guideline any harder.

view more: ‹ prev next ›