Iโd think many of us have large amounts of mostly idle cores. ๐
If I were to start from scratch, Iโd pick something power efficient first.
this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
Homelab
371 readers
9 users here now
Rules
- Be Civil.
- Post about your homelab, discussion of your homelab, questions you may have, or general discussion about transition your skill from the homelab to the workplace.
- No memes or potato images.
- We love detailed homelab builds, especially network diagrams!
- Report any posts that you feel should be brought to our attention.
- Please no shitposting or blogspam.
- No Referral Linking.
- Keep piracy discussion off of this community
founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
so more cores it'd imagine?
Correct. I went for the most powerful processor I could find cuz I was gonna do all the things.
Now I think I'm using a total of 3 out of 32 cores.
Did you mean an i5-8400 instead? As there is no i5-8700 - that's an i7, which would have the same number of cores as the 9700.
The i5-8400 would be fine for most IT homelabs; there are some specific applications that really need more power than that (especially any of the Cisco bits from what I've heard, but I have no first-hand experience with those).
What exactly are you planning on doing with the homelab?
My home lab attempts to duplicate much of what I use and support at work. As such, I have many VMs, each with a particular purpose or running a particular piece of software. So, for me, it's a combination of more cores and decent speed of each. However, in virtualization, it's common to run out of RAM in a host before you run out of processing power.