626
submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

And no IPad version to

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 112 points 8 months ago

Isn't the web version a full client that works without a phone nearby nowadays?

[-] [email protected] 87 points 8 months ago

Yes it is, and because of who owns it, I would even prefer that to an unsandboxed closed source native binary.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 8 months ago

Pretty much I'll never understand why people want their webpages to be apps with access to all your shit

[-] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

It's because the vast, vast, VAST majority of people have no idea that many apps are just showing a website. Also, the app version is almost always more efficient in terms of precious phone screen real estate compared to a browser. Apps also remember who you are so you don't have to login. It isn't hard to understand why people like them.

That said, many apps are horrible from a privacy perspective. But that is largely hidden from the average user, most of whom simply don't think much about online privacy anyway.

I hope the ubiquity of irritating ads are the thin edge of the wedge that gets more people interested in ad-blocking, and then perhaps online privacy more generally.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 27 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yes, but no calls, because apparently a browser doesnt have microphone and speaker support

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 72 points 8 months ago

I wouldn't install it on my system in any case.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 8 months ago

Same. No sane linux user should.

Und: Hubi ist Linux Nutzer konfirmiert. - 2023, koloriert

[-] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago
[-] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago

I don’t like WhatsApp, but some people simply refuse to use anything else (“better”) and the web clients can bridge the gap but it’s extremely annoying not being able to answer a call with a person you are texting

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 48 points 8 months ago

Stop using Facebook products

[-] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

I'm tired of seeing it

[-] [email protected] 29 points 8 months ago

Even if it exists, then it does not have to be good. Look at Microsoft Teams.

[-] WindowsEnjoyer 32 points 8 months ago
[-] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago

I also hate it but unfortunately have to use it for work.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

It's a stopgap but Teams for Linux at least gives you Wayland support, choice of seperate window sharing and background filters

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] [email protected] 29 points 8 months ago

WhatsApp is owned by Meta right?

[-] [email protected] 19 points 8 months ago
[-] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago

Not sure why anyone would use it. I certainly wouldn't.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 8 months ago

Couple reasons:

WhatsApp was its own company, took advantage of an open market in EU where SMS (and "international" phone calls?) were extra rate charges on mobile phones. Once every one got accustomed to using whatsapp Meta took it over and now we're stuck with it.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

To communicate with anyone outside of the US, where it is extremely popular and is the main interaction with many businesses as well.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago

It's almost impossible not to sadly, at least if you want to reach everybody in ypur contacts... It was the first popular messaging app here and inertia prevents people from moving to better alternatives now.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] [email protected] 24 points 8 months ago

It's a web app, you don't really need a native application for it.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

I just use discord via the browser. Why would I allow it to harvest my data as an app?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kecessa 22 points 8 months ago

Meanwhile in the US and Canada: So, I'll just send an SMS, k?

[-] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

Also in the US: Blue SmS right?

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago

Stop using that shit

[-] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago

"best i can do is a chromium only web app"

[-] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Works in Firefox for me

[-] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago

Facebook couldn't bother making a proper Android app for years. Now you want them to make Linux apps? The likelihood is small...

[-] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago

My MF smartwatch has WhatsApp but still no Linux version.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

You shouldn't use this app in the first place. It had many data breaches and it copy everything from Telegram (maybe everyone copies, but I don't use other apps). I only mainly use Telegram and Matrix.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago

It's impossible to convince that to friends and family. In my country everyone use WhatsApp as primary messaging app . It's kind of like iMessage situation in US

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago

VIBER HAS A LINUX VERSION?!?!

also android is kinda linux

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

Why are we installing Whatsapp to begin with?

[-] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

Where I live everything is on WhatsApp. You want to get ahold of a business: WhatsApp, friends organizing a party: WhatsApp, want to check the traffic: WhatsApp.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

Discord on Linux kinda sucks, though. It's more resource demanding than the Windows version and I can't even stream with audio.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago

There are plenty of desktop wrappers available for the Web version. I don't use WhatsApp often but from my experience it seems fairly similar to the Windows desktop app

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

web.whatsapp.com works really well

edit: It does not do voice or video but I'm OK switching to my phone for those

[-] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago

Its proprietary so that's not a shock

[-] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
626 points (96.6% liked)

linuxmemes

19849 readers
791 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS