this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)

MovieSnob

20 readers
1 users here now

A community to discuss, debate, and celebrate the history of cinema, emphasis on—but not exclusively—the groundbreaking, avant garde and experimental, with a healthy dose of irreverence instead of the usual navel-gazing that usually surrounds cineastic appreciation.


Community Rules

  1. "All is fair in love and war" but keep it witty or, at minimum, intelligent. If you can't do either, keep walking. This community's administrators will not abide simpletons nor bullies.

  2. "Franchise picture" fans and similar ilk, be forewarned: you are open game to be verbally flayed in this public square. Did you not see the name of this community?

  3. There ~~may~~ will be occasionally adult subject matter (NSFW)—such is the nature of the beast. While it is not the scope of this community to purvey nor condone extreme or gratuitous sex or violence, neither subjects are necessarily condemned when in context with the subject matter at hand. It is also not the scope of this community to discuss only adult themes; how else could one discuss Fleming's The Wizard of Oz (1939) or Donen/Kelly's Singing In The Rain (1952)?

  • It is suggested you do not subscribe if you are highly sensitive to either subjects.

  • It is strongly suggested that authors of submitted posts mark NSFW content as such. Err on the side of doubt.

  1. All opinions expressed are strictly of the respective authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the moderators of this community nor the administrators of this instance (lemmy.film).

Logrolling

icon [email protected]

icon [email protected]

icon [email protected]

icon [email protected]


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Wow! My first NSFW post! I'm a big boy now!

I can't do E.E. Merhige's Begotten (1989). It's not the imagery I've seen, per se: stills from the film don't disturb me enough to look away and I'm not a fan of gore. I'm fairly certain of how much he's getting away with the purposely degraded, B&W imagery like that—look at how far Hitchcock got using Bosco in Psycho. No, I think it's the combination of the imagery of the seemingly infinite self-immolation coupled with the Foley, that particular walking-through-deep-mud sucking-and-squishing.

I might have gotten through 15 minutes before I had to shut it down. I never even made it to the second scene. I can't do Begotten…can you?

Bonus link: Merhige's Din Of Celestial Birds (2006), the sequel to Begotten and apparently the second in a trilogy. David Lynch fans should notice a more-than-passing similarity between Din of Celestial Birds and the eighth episode of Twin Peaks: The Return (2019). A veritable 69 of inspiration!

Super Bonus Link: Stateless: E. Elias Merhige—an interview with our spotlighted director with clips from the absolutely beautiful Polia & Blastema. I was pleasantly surprised to discover how much we are in sync regarding cinema.

Epilepsy warning!: in both links there may be flashing video which may trigger reflex seizures. If you are sensitive to flashing lights and/or suffer from reflex seizures, please do not follow the links for your own good. See, The King cares. 🫶

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"...makes Eraserhead seem like 'Ernest Saves Christmas'."

--Critic's Choice, Time Magazine

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I have to chuckle every time I see this comment!