Linux

48008 readers

832 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Ted Tso gives some insight on the LKML on the Red Hat & IBM approach to software (mander.xyz)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://lkml.org/lkml/2023/7/6/1228

From Ted, the ext4 maintainer, on the LKML a few days ago.

The thread is about mainlining bcachefs but the post from Ted, who from what little I know seems about as trustworthy as ext4 has been over the past few decades, gives an interesting overview of the business approaches to software of IBM, Red Hat, Google & Sun Microsystems.

Of general interest to myself but mainly posting as it seems relevant to the recent changes in RHEL, CentOS, Rocky, Alma & Fedora over the past few weeks/years and gives some context of how we got where we are from ~2010.

top 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Was there meant to be a linky?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

linked added to the OP....odd, I posted it as a link, but added an image which seems to be the only visible content.

Sorry, new here & confused by stuff.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2023/7/6/1228

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

No worries, I'm new here myself :)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

OP's argument is mostly this

IBM hosted that meeting, but ultimately, never did contribute any developers to the btrfs effort. That's because IBM had a fairly cold, hard examination of what their enterprise customers really wanted, and would be willing to pay $$$, and the decision was made at a corporate level (higher up than the Linux Technology Center, although I participated in the company-wide investigation) that none of OS's that IBM supported (AIX, zOS, Linux, etc.) needed ZFS-like features,because IBM's customers didn't need them.

So it's about money and they don't care about innovation or anything like it. Just like Microsoft.

It's such a shame that Red Hat was sold to these guys, Red Hat did so much good for the linux community.

But this is all in the past now, we won't see any improvements coming from them that don't directly relate to company profits.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I met the guy who made bcachefs in Philadelphia and watched a play with him. we then walked through the city at night for 3 hours.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Better him than the ReiserFS guy

load more comments