AMD

I didn't get the reference and at this point I'm too afraid to ask.

Buck maybe ?

https://youtu.be/x7cwWoK0gz4?si=ASHAsp9z8DnEUY1D

Hey OP — Your post has been removed for not being in compliance with Rule 3.

Be civil and follow side-wide rules, this means no insults, personal attacks, slurs, brigading, mass mentioning users or other rude behaviour

Discussing politics or religion is also not allowed on /r/AMD

Please read the rules or message the mods for any further clarification

If the rumors that the -C parts are being fabbed on TSMC 3nm are true, then the idea that there will be increased margins for the cloud server variants vs Turin might not end up being true at all.

I think we're going to see a lot of Zen5c cold sold with hyperthreading disabled. You get the density of the smaller core and the security benefit of taking out a lot of speculative execution vulnerabilities.

There was another rumor about doubling the size of the CCX for Zen5. So the 'Bergamo Next' could be 12x 16-core Zen5c dies on the package. 192 Threads of secure dense goodness.

They're intentionally designed to run that hot... They don't use very much power at all. It would be different if you lost any meaningful performance with cooling capacity increases past minimum.