For all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Threadripper, EPYC, rumors, reviews, news and more.
Yeah AMD dominates COD. Dunno where they get the double the price nonsense though, the 4090 is 1600 vs 1000 msrp compared.
Nvidia raster is not so hot. They try to win with upscaling and ray tracing, but I dunno... people might want to take a hard think over what's really worth having. Nvidia does have extras though in terms of productivity app stuff that AMD typically just never even sees an equal to. But man it's depressing the price Nvidia has marked things up with such bad raster/power management and just hoping people live on upscaling.
For example RTX 4080 vs. RX 7900 XTX raster in average are almost identical, there are outliers which favor AMD or nVidia but in the big picture the RX 7900 XTX isn't as great because it lack a lots of cutting edge technologies. So no, in rasterization the 40 series is great...
Weird how this post seemed to trigger quite a lot of people.
On other news, water is wet
Have had both cards but currently using the 4090. XTX did bench better than my 4090 in warzone 2 unless I turned on dlss (quality didn’t look as good). Xtx benched at 306 while 4090 hit 320s with dlss on (w/ off roughly the same). Xtx is a fantastic card for anyone chasing fps in cod and the software is very simple.
AMD wrecks Nvidia in all CoD games.
Also the 4090 is barely in stock anywhere with massively inflated prices.
Wrecks it with 7fps lead at 1080p
And is behind at 4k…
All the 4090 were shipped to China to try and beat embargo date, absolute pinnacle leather jacket moment.
probably cause they were all being sent to china before the ban went into effect.
sounds like a good time to sell my TUF 4090 and grab a 7900 XTX lol.
Curious to see what it does for warzone 3 in Dec
Any idea if it’s better for Counter-Strike 2?
7900xtx gets 350-400 fps on all maps with my 5950x on mostly high 1440p settings.
I’m sure the 4090 is better for this particular game, though.
this is like the article with the 4090 being 4x faster in Alan Wake 2 with path tracing. Yep, the cards are very good at the things they do well....
Isn’t the slide pictured showing in comparison to a 4080?
If COD is your jam then AMD is your card.
Exactly lol I was playing yesterday no dlss On my LG 45 Oled , 230 plus frames
How about Battlefield?
I dont buy jam, I buy honey, and I kiss it on the lips.
4090 wins at 4K/UHD I see in the original test. Yet this is nothing new. COD favors AMD but its a console slap port.
We can all cherrypick games tho. I can find games where 4070 Ti beat 7900XTX too 🤣
Cool story bro.
is MW3 an AMD sponsored title?
AVG FPS*, the year is 2023 and people still falls for it
Yeah, that's not news. AMD cards have been faster at CoD games for a while.
And in alan wake 2 4090 is 4 times faster than 7900xtxt . Its all good
What other games have AMD "bias"? I feel like im used to seeing games with more Nvidia bias .
Not so fast. Literally, not so fast. AMD gpus may render 20-30% more frames per second, however you can’t call that performance because it has higher input latency without Nvidia’s Reflex. It has more motion-fluidity, but they are like fake frames because they don’t have the responsiveness of real frames. People say that’s the reason why more performance is good. So even when you win, you lose. Misleading marketing from AMD.
This is how it's been for the last 2 years, AMD always seems to be better except... for ray tracing, that's where nvidia always gets us and continues to be the market leader.
Does MW3 even have ray tracing?
It's the same as MW2, so nothing new. They just didn't bother optimizing the Nvidia side.
Yes but only for the first months. Any AMD products shits itself after a few miles
I get 350fps @1440p with a mix of competitive settings with my 4090/13600k on mw3. Don’t believe this crap lol
Not at 4k it's not.
OK, but I don't play MW3. Instead my 7900XTX is crying in Witcher 3 when I try and turn on Ray Tracing.
If you cherry pick game outliers, you can make any card look great or awful. E.g., the 7900XTX will cry if you pick Portal RTX or sing in MW3. A holistic look is required to evaluate.
Weird. I have 7800 xt and most of the time I get 0 fps in COD :) all I see are black screen crashes ^^
The AMD drivers experience its all about loading screens and crashing LMAO.
Have several machines here and the only ones with weird issues are all the AMD GPU powered ones lol
How is it possible that 3090ti scores about 4070 (non Ti)!? I don’t think 4070 has any theoretical advantages over 3090ti !
It's the best value in terms of raster 4K performance. The 4090 is being scooped up for AI-Tasks, and actually has gone up 10% in price. The 7900XT and XTX will age well, no doubt.
Although the 7900xtx does achieve a higher frame count, I recall seeing on youtube several people doing 4090 vs 7900xtx benchmarks claiming the 7900xtx doesn’t run as smooth as the 4090 on cod and warzone. Sounds like it could be a driver thing tho
Oh no. I guess I’ll just double my frames with DLSS3 then. I doubt there will be much extra latency since my 4090 already runs it in the hundreds already.
Ofcourse, because MW3 is just a MW2 DLC at full price.
They're serious Lol. AMD fanboys are cute.
Got a 6700xt and I’m not going back to amd gpu. It just headache after headache.
This is probably due to cod being super optimized for consoles that run off of rdna architecture. Even the Series S has a 120fps mode and dips down to the 90s.
Alot of games the xtx is clearly faster, specially mmo’s
This is not even new. The 6950XT was faster than a 3090Ti in 1440p and below, but cost $1100 vs the 3090Ti's $2000.
It’s something about the architecture of the cards. PS5 and Xbox series both have custom AMD gpus as well and COD designs around console experiences so yeah it makes sense that AMD gpus would be better suited