this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
3232 points (87.2% liked)

Meta (lemm.ee)

3595 readers
1 users here now

lemm.ee Meta

This is a community for discussion about this particular Lemmy instance.

News and updates about lemm.ee will be posted here, so if that's something that interests you, make sure to subscribe!


Rules:


If you're a Discord user, you can also join our Discord server: https://discord.gg/XM9nZwUn9K

Discord is only a back-up channel, [email protected] will always be the main place for lemm.ee communications.


If you need help with anything, please post in !support instead.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Context

There have been a lot of posts and comments recently about Facebook entering the fediverse, and how different instances will handle it. Many people have asked me to commit to pre-emptively defederating from Threads before they even implement ActivityPub.

The lemm.ee federation policy states that it's not a goal for lemm.ee to curate content for our users, but we will certainly defederate any server which aims to systematically break our rules. I want to point out here that Facebook makes essentially all of its money from advertising, and lemm.ee has a no advertising rule - basically, Facebook has a built-in financial incentive to break our rules. ActivityPub has no protections against advertising, so it's likely we will end up having to eventually defederate from Threads just for this reason alone.

However, I would still like to get a feel for how many people in our instance are actually excited for potential federation with Threads. While personally I feel that any theoretical pros are by far outweighed by cons, I do want to use this opportunity to see how much of the community disagrees with me. I am not intending to run this instance as a democracy (sorry if anybody is disappointed by that), but I would still like to have a clear picture of user feedback for potentially major decisions such as this one. This is why I am asking every user who wants lemm.ee to federate with Facebook to please downvote this post.


Here are some reasons why I personally believe that Threads will have a negative effect on the fediverse

  • As mentioned above, Facebook is completely driven by ad revenue. There is nothing stopping them from sending out ads as posts/comments with artificially inflated scores, which would ensure that their ads end up on the "all" page of federated servers.
  • Threads already has more users than all Lemmy instances combined. Even if their algorithms don't apply to the rest of the fediverse directly, they can still completely dictate what the "all" page will look like for all instances by simply controlling what their own users see and vote on.
  • Moderation does not seem to be a priority for Threads so far, meaning that they would create massive moderation workloads for smaller instances.
  • In general, Facebook has shown countless times that they don't have their users best interests in mind. They view users as something to exploit for revenue. There are probably ways they are already thinking about hurting the fediverse that we can't even imagine yet.

By the way, we're not really in any rush today with our decision regarding federation

  • Threads does not have ActivityPub support yet today
  • Even if they add ActivityPub support, their UX is geared towards Mastodon-like usage - it seems unlikely that there would ever be proper interoperability between Threads and Lemmy
  • We don't really know what to defederate from - it's completely possible that "threads.net" will not be their ActivityPub domain at all.

So go ahead and downvote if you feel defederation would be a mistake, and feel free to share your thoughts in the comments! It would be super helpful to me if folks who are in favor of federating with Threads could leave a comment explaining their reasoning.


Update:

By now, it's clear that there is a group of users who are in favor of federating with Threads. The breakdown is like this (based on downvotes):

  • lemm.ee users: 136 in favor of federating with Threads
  • Others: 288 in favor of federating with Threads

While it seems to be a minority, it's still quite a few users. There is no way to please all users in this situation - any decision I make will certainly inconvenience some of you, and I apologize for that.

A big thanks to everybody who has shared opinions and arguments in comments so far. I think there are several well written comments that have been unfairly downvoted, but I have personally read all comments and tried to respond to several as well. I will keep reading them as they come in.

The main facts I am working with right now are as follows:

  • The majority of lemm.ee users are strongly opposed to immediately federating with Threads
  • Facebook has a proven track record of exploiting users (and a built-in financial incentive to do so)
  • We currently lack proper federation/moderation tools to allow us to properly handle rule breaking content from Facebook

Considering all of the above, I believe the initial approach for lemm.ee should be to defederate Threads, and then monitor the situation for a period of time to determine if federating with them in the future is a realistic option

In order to federate with them, the following conditions would need to be fulfilled:

  • There needs to be actual interoperability between Threads and Lemmy
  • Threads needs to prove that they are not flooding instances with rule-breaking content (mainly ads and bigotry for lemm.ee)
  • There needs to be a mechanism to prevent feed manipulation by Threads algorithms (potentially this means discarding all incoming votes from Threads)

Note: this is an initial list, subject to change as we learn more about Threads.

Again, I realize this approach won't please everybody, but I really believe it's the best approach on a whole for now. Please feel free to keep adding comments and keep the discussion going if you think there is something I have not considered.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (11 children)

I can only see negative on this topic. What are the pro's of letting lemm.ee federate?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (14 children)

I'm for federating with any instance that doesn't exist explicitly to break this community rules. I turned blind eye to not defederating Exploding Heads because Lemm.ee is a small server that doesn't host any big communities they could interfere with. I thought it was an indication that it's an instance that would allow me to curate my experience.

This is a European server, it's fair to assume most of the users here are protected by GDPR. The talk of scraping data seems like a nonsense, Meta can do it without federating. And as Elon learned, closing your APIs means other entities will do web scraping which puts more stress on your infrastructure.

I don't understand how most people here are for open standards, interoperability and the moment their protocol of choice gets traction they drop everything and opt to create their walled garden, except with 5 dozens of people. This is it, you've literally won. I guess some people will keep fighting big corporations for any reason on principle. That's ok but not something most people are interested in.

There's a lot of talk about how XMPP was killed by Embrace, Extend, Extinguish. I'm convinced 99% people posting that same blog post that sells opinions as facts, haven't actually lived through it. XMPP was embraced, then Google and Facebook got bored, dropped it and moved on. They did not poison the protocol in any way.

If Meta tries to extend Activity Pub in a malicious way then that's the point you defederate. If they get bored of Activity Pub and move on you have lost nothing, you probably gained more users than you would if you didn't federate. I don't believe it will come to this, EU Digital Markets Act means more platforms will have to open up, other commercial platforms will join in to capitalize on that and we'll end up with consortiums coming up with reasonable changes to standards. If not they'll get bonked by EU regulators with even more laws.

Finally, it's a shame that we've done this vote via Lemmy post. It has hit "All" view for a lot of people who are not part of this instance and probably irreversibly poisoned this discussion.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I’m convinced 99% people posting that same blog post that sells opinions as facts, haven’t actually lived through it.

I'm a person who lost contact with people on Facebook while using Pidgin. This unfortunate development in ancient history actually forced me to briefly register on Facebook to maintain contact - because they couldn't be convinced to adopt Pidgin and Pidgin users were a minority (as were users of other XMPP messenger apps, at least separately counted).

Prognosis: Facebook will play along to gain mass, then go incompatible. They will do this at a moment when they think users will gravitate towards their side of the fence.

Advise: never open that door, there be dragons on the other side.

We should remember what they have already done, and expect more of the same, because they haven't changed. Justified grudges are perfectly fine to hold. A corporation that has harmed society by supporting polarization in many countries (formation of echo chambers, targeted advertising) should be boycotted in retribution.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Meta/Threads/Facebook can’t sit at the table with us. Defed. Let them collect data & profit off of their own users.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Upvoting for visibility and content usefulness counteracting downvotes for interest in federation 🤷

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I would like the fediverse to grow organically at a steady pace. Just from a pure logistical view alone Threads could overwhelm our instance, let alone moderating. I don't see anything +ves from federating with Threads.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend,_and_extinguish

Also threads.net should be the ActivityPub domain, when they show you how you will be able to view user profiles on other instances it's using threads.net domain name.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (11 children)

In favor of federating

  1. Presumption of innocence - until they actually push ads to ActivityPub, there’s no formal reason to defederate. The moment they do - cut the cord
  2. Same thing with EEE - defederate the moment they change the protocol unilaterally, not before
  3. It’s a stress test for Lemmy. What if lemme.world grows 100x and dominates the global feed - it’ll be sad if our only solution at that point was to defederate from them
  4. Federation does not give Facebook more ads data: entire ActivityPub ecosystem is open and scrapable, they will still know that [email protected] asked a question about growing shrooms
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Please don't. We don't want Meta to get more control.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Not my instance ~~(so I didn't vote)~~, but I must say this is a very reasonable approach. I wish other instances would also consider these points.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

I concur with you in that this is a great example on how to handle the situation in advance and prepare for when the situation is imminent. I really like the write-up and the @[email protected]'s stance on the matter. Prime example of a great instance administration, I think.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No you should vote. This affects us all

Now I won’t pretend I’m smart or anything but meta will probably make giant communities and then lock them behind their ~~data harvester~~ app when enough users have joined

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I agree that we should defederate from meta. We moved over here because of the shitty corporations so we shouldn't let them in now that we are actually creating a community away from them

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lemmy really needs an option for non federated posts. I'm not a part of this instance, but I can still vote.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Direct democracy in action.. I love this shit...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I'd like to see how Threads evolves before preemptively deciding to cease interacting with it. However, if it's anything like Facebook or Instagram today then please keep it away from me

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Though I was not in favor of federating with threads, I do love the idea of monitoring the situation, I don't like to close any possibility off I don't have high hopes for threads in the fediverse.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I'm kind of expecting Threads to be stillborn but that might just be the post Google Plus in me

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I really hope it is. We've cultivated a nice community on the fediverse and I don't want some shady corpo ruining it for all of us.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I really like it here. I came here to interact with other people without the greedy exploitation and manipulation of huge companies that try to inject themselves into every aspect of users' lives just for the privilege of socializing online. The business model of every single large player in social media is disgusting and antisocial. This forum is perfect the way it is and interacting with any large corporation can't do anything positive, but can definitely contribute to ruining what you've got here. Thanks again for running this instance.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m happy to manage my own subscriptions and block settings to hide any content from Threads or other instances I may not enjoy. I don’t need my instance doing that for me.

My understanding of the argument for defederation is basically “but they might monetise all our social graphs”, but our content is publicly available on the Internet, so they can do that regardless.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Let’s just tell ZUCC he’s not invited, guy ruins everything he touches.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›