Sacramento Sheriff is sharing license plate reader data with anti-abortion states, records show : technology

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago

"In May, EFF released a report showing that 71 law enforcement agencies in 22 California counties — including Sacramento County — were sharing such data. The practice is in violation of a 2015 law that states “a (California law enforcement) agency shall not sell, share, or transfer ALPR information, except to another (California law enforcement) agency, and only as otherwise permitted by law.”

Link to the mentioned EFF report : https://www.eff.org/press/releases/civil-liberties-groups-demand-california-police-stop-sharing-drivers-location-data

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I bet he's a Republican...

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago

I mean, hes a cop. Doesnt matter what his affiliation is. Theyre all the same.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The sheriff is a Democrat

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

Sinema was a "Democrat". That bridge troll in NC that gave gop a supermajority was a "Democrat". Manchin is a "Democrat". Look at who they actually are and not their facade.

Cooper has also been described as a "crusader against criminal justice reform". Examples of this include his opposition to Proposition 47 and support for Proposition 20.
Cooper is opposed to fossil fuel divestment and played a key role in halting the progression of SB 1173, a bill that would have forced CalPERS and CalSTRS to divest from most fossil fuel holdings.*

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

Cops are fascists.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

ACA, as we know, B

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Someone kick that guy in the sack. Remento.

[+] [email protected] -15 points 1 year ago

If you're pro choice you shouldn't care anymore than someone plucking a tick at a state park.

[+] [email protected] -33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And suddenly liberals care about privacy :)

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

I may need a bit of a reminder when Republicans were the party of "privacy" since I'm fairly certain both parties aren't that great with it. Democrats may be at least more upfront about it but damn republicans love to say they "care about privacy to do ____" unless its falls out of their "values" then it not about privacy its about banning it and harassing those who dare go against their "Judeo Christian values"

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Roe V. Wade was predicated on the constitutional right to privacy, ya dunce. The argument was always about privacy.

Edit to point out, apparently I hurt the feelings of 2 of those “Facts don’t care about your feelings” folks by pointing out facts. Melt snowflakes 🔥❄️🔥

Technology

Our Rules

Approved Bots