I think both of these are actually correct. They feel fine to me, although I’d probably tighten the first one to “It is a thing that produces stuff.”
Maybe it’s a dialect thing?
this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
6 points (87.5% liked)
English usage and grammar
360 readers
2 users here now
A community to discuss and ask questions about English usage and grammar.
If your post refers to a specific English variant, please indicate it within square brackets (for instance [Canadian]).
Online resources:
- Cambridge English Dictionary
- Merriam-Webster Dictionary and Thesaurus
- Gilman's Webster's Dictionary of English Usage. This is a great and witty reference about usage, its history, and its controveries
Sibling communities:
Rules of conduct:
The usual ones on Lemmy and Mastodon.. In short: be kind or at least respectful, no offensive language, no harassment, no spam.
(Icon: entry "English" in the Oxford English Dictionary, 1933. Banner: page from Chaucer's "The Wife of Bath's Tale".)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I’d probably tighten the first one to “It is a thing that produces stuff.”
That omits descriptive information though. The example includes the fact that the thing "works" which is how it "produces stuff".
Maybe it’s a dialect thing?
It is certainly a grammatical issue.
How about an infinitive? "It is a thing that works to produce stuff."
Hm, while that does seem to fit, it feels as if its intent doesn't necessarily align. To me, that is more of a description of it's purpose rather than what it does.
Ok, how about doubling up on the present participles? "The thing is working, producing stuff."
If I'm honest; Neither of those sentences make any sense to me as a native English speaker (reader, in this case).
What idea are you trying to communicate? That there is a thing, and it works (Is functiobal? Is operating presenly?), and it produces stuff?
Both of those are really awkwardly constructed. If I'm reading it correctly, "works" is the state of the thing, and "producing stuff" is what the thing is supposed to do, and every construction I can come up with for this sentence that doesn't feel super awkward puts the latter first.