this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
0 points (50.0% liked)

Technology

59196 readers
2531 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Will people here use/try Meta's #threads when available? Would love to know the reasons or if it would be just for fun/curiosity.

The amount of data collected is insane imo.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Definitely not. I didn't come to the Fediverse to be under social media companies again.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I stay the fuck away from anything Meta/Facebook, so absolutely not.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

My brother in Christ, you're asking people on Lemmy if they're going to try meta spyware

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I was curious how it compared to Mastodon. It didn't.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

We need to let meta die slowly, so no.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Privacy-wise, I already use Facebook, WhatsApp, Messenger and Instagram, and I'm pretty sure that Mark Zuckerberg knows everything that he'd ever want to know about me. I largely believe in the conspiracy theory that Meta actively listens in on users in some way to serve them ads and targeted content, even if the evidence is circumstantial at best.

Despite this, would I still use Threads? Probably not.

Microblogging isn't my thing. 140 characters is nowhere near enough space to articulate your thoughts and it feels like the site was originally designed around SMS text message limitations more than anything. I also don't like how the only way you can get any genuine interaction on places like Twitter or even Mastodon is to be a celebrity.

I do agree that we should collectively defederate Threads much in the same way that everybody on the fediverse collectively blacklisted Gab, not necessarily as a fuck-you to Zuckerberg, but because a flood of Instagram normies would completely cripple other instances with traffic.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah, fuck that and fuck them

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Never. Fuck Meta. Fuck Zuckerberg.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it's exciting. I don't hate Twitter, but a competitor with big money back in that's potentially going to integrate with the fediverse? That's fucking exciting.

Will they actively contribute or fork it? Who knows.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They will actively contribute while growing their userbase. When they hit critical mass they will cutoff the fediverse and take their users and their content with them. It happened before.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

no definitely not installing it or opening an account.

I'm not against federation tho, I'd be in favour of showing people you can get all the same content through another channel. defederating means that people will have to use it if there's content from someone they like on there. I don't want to give people a reason to install that shit.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Not touching that, nope.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Thanks to @m0bi13 who posted this breakdown for context :

Data collected by #threads:

  • Health & Fitness
    
    
  • Financial info
    
    
  • Contact info
    
    
  • User content
    
    
  • Browsing History
    
    
  • Usage Data
    
    
  • Diagnostics
    
    
  • Purchases
    
    
  • Location
    
    
  • Contacts
    
    
  • Search history
    
    
  • Identifiers
    
    
  • Sensitive Info
    
    
  • Other Data
    
    

Oh fuck no. The very first line is basically a HIPAA violation. It gets worse from there. We require less disclosure from Supreme Court Justices and Presidential nominees.

This is a trainwreck waiting to happen - even if Facebook itself doesn't abuse this level of power, you know that bad actors within the organization will. And once the information is collected, you know that tyrannical governments all over the world will be falling over themselves to get access to the data. This is a stalker's wetdream, an Orwellian orgasm of truly grotesque proportions.

Keep the Fediverse from Zucking. Just say no to Threads.

load more comments
view more: next ›