this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
32 points (94.4% liked)

Europe

8324 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out [email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What happens to the delicious human soup after they're finished?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Seriously, this is my main question also! What about heavy metal in the soup, diseases, implants etc?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the whole thing looks like an autoclave and it looks like it reaches 125 degrees celsius so it's basically one.

diseases are gone, solids are probably picked out of the broth when they put the bones in the blender.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I see, thank you very much for your input!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I hope this becomes a thing in Germany. If it is less energy consuming than burning, I would want it for my burial. The bone dust then goes to a "resting forest" (Ruhewald) with no grave, just buried in a recycling paper bag at the roots of a tree.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

this natural process uses water, not fire, making it gentler on the body

Hrm, somehow I don't think that this is all that important

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Basically they make human bone broth, and the family gets the bones back.

next headline will bei "Nestlé enters cremation business" and soylent green is real...

sorry, this is sarcasm if anyone needs the hint...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is burial (if that they don't embalm or use a sealed casket) less environmentally friendly?

Dig a hole and toss them in. Keep the nitrogen cycle going properly.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

maybe because cemetaries are a waste of real estate, but so are chateaux and mansions. also cremation could be an economical alternative comparing to burial.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Good ol’ UK. Can’t use my hosepipe to use the water I pay for to water my tomatoes I’m growing because they are now £250 per kg in the shops. However businesses can use whatever the fuck they want.

Don’t use your own water to help save the planet…….. Oh look, we’re now washing bones to help save the planet….

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Nice rant, but you should read the article.

This has not much to do with water consumption, but it describes to chemically dissolve corpse flesh instead of burning it. The bones will remain and they have to grind them down.

"Water Cremation" just sounds a lot nicer to potential customers and might remind of a funeral at sea. Bringing grandpa to the "Flesh Dissolver" would be a more appropriate term but probably bad for business.

load more comments
view more: next ›