this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
1052 points (96.5% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54772 readers
428 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

$25 to rent the movie, one watch within max 24 hours after you start watching it... Or $5 more to own it. Scammers.

(page 6) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Art, like love, must always be free.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I can understand not being interested in the movie or the price point or digital "ownership", but why does it make them scammers to offer the purchase at a price that heavily amortizes down the cost per viewing?

The rental price is on par with two theater tickets and they're not playing games with pretending like the purchase price should be double because you plan to watch it at least twice.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm also happy I'll never watch this film

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It actually was pretty entertaining. About as good as any film directed towards teens and women.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Couldn't finish the movie, it was such trash.... I'm happy I didn't pay to watch it at least.

Me and my girlfriend laughed maybe 3 times and then the yawning started... This movie is made for small kids right? Otherwise I don't understand why it's popular.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›