this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
320 points (91.5% liked)

AnarchyChess

4900 readers
12 users here now

Holy hell

Other chess communities:
[email protected]
[email protected]

Matrix space

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 96 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You can support them by realizing that white male capitalist patriarchy is pitting you against each other as a distraction, so the solution is Fully Automated Luxury Gay Space Communism

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Don't trust the rooks, all rooks are ~~bastards~~ crooks

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 66 points 10 months ago (1 children)

White wins on a patriarchal technicality, though black still has advantage

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago

And the moral high ground.

[–] Zeppo 46 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Two queens? Black can't lose.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Games have been won against opponents with multiple queens

[–] [email protected] 44 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But how many have won against an opponent with no king?

[–] Zeppo 1 points 10 months ago

There’s no king to put in check, though. But also I wasn’t talking seriously or in absolute terms.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago

That only works if your opponent is a minor.

[–] pastermil 32 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Your opponent already lost by losing the king. The end.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

at least they gained a queen in the process

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago
[–] jbrains 8 points 10 months ago

I'm not sure, but Descriptive Notation for black is going to be complicated.

[–] CookieJarObserver 3 points 10 months ago

Gay Beam obviously.