this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
132 points (98.5% liked)

Blahaj Lemmy Meta

2389 readers
74 users here now

Blåhaj Lemmy is a Lemmy instance attached to blahaj.zone. This is a group for questions or discussions relevant to either instance.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

My wonderful co-admin @[email protected] has made a modification to the downvote system. It's not currently enabled, but if we were to turn it on, downvotes would be available for use, but they would weigh 5 times less than an upvote.

Which is to say, it would take 5 downvotes to counter an upvote. This would let downvotes have an impact on what appears in the hot topics sort, but hopefully mitigate some of the more negative impacts of downvoting.

Are there any strong objections from Blahaj Lemmy users to enabling downvotes with this modification?

(page 2) 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Having been here for a couple of days I now feel that downvotes are a bad idea. They don't add anything of value to the discussion that cannot be expressed by simply not upvoting. If they must be re-enabled (which I disagree with) I think they should be at least an order of magnitude different, 20:1 or even 50:1, just to make brigading harder. I don't miss them from Reddit, and if they're enabled at 5:1, I'd consider finding another instance where they're just disabled - but hey, I'm new, so I might be missing something.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How does this work with communities on other instances? Currently we can't downvotes those, but would this allow us to?

Anyway, I say either go all in or don't allow them at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This sounds way better than disabling downvotes completely. This would probably be a fair compromise between downvotes killing posts too easily and allowing bad/low-quality posts to rise.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›