Artificial Intelligence - Ethics | Law | Philsophy

6 readers

3 users here now

We follow Lemmy’s code of conduct.

Communities

Useful links

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

A test of artificial intelligence - Nature (www.nature.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] rarely 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

LLM != intelligence.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is that you're opinion, or are you actually drawing from the article?

[–] rarely 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's fact.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In your opinion.

In response to the one you just deleted: It’s not marketing, Nature is a scientific journal, and this is a review of approaches to measuring the presence or absence of such intelligence.

[–] rarely 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's why I deleted it, bucko. Wrong person. Unrelated.

It's not my opinion, it's fact. Spellcheckers and LLMs are not new. I've built a few of them. It isn't intelligence. That's not refutable.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Spellcheckers are not LLMs. If you've built both, you should know that.