481
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 64 points 10 months ago

Just chuck more data at it and hope for the best! It's a pretty fun strategy even if it fails a lot

[-] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago

I'm convinced they're just into machine learning because of the funny mistakes they make

[-] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago

That's honestly one of the best parts about it. Reading error messages and thinking logically is boring compared to trying to guess how this stupid LLM got the idea to spit out what it did.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

ML honestly sounds like a maddeningly dull profession to me because of this. It's a cool technology but jiggling hyperparameters and then waiting would grate on me.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 10 months ago

Nvidia stock goes brrrr

[-] [email protected] 26 points 10 months ago

Any task that can be expressed as mostly translation is a good task to try with an LLM.

And you know what? Stakeholders tend to love LLMs, so have fun with your complicated problems while I build them by using the ancient technique of slapping some boilerplate together and combining it with the new ways of pasting error messages into chatgippity.

[-] [email protected] 38 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I don't think that was the point. The thing is, people replace calculators with that...

  • User: Assistant?
  • Assistant: * BEEP *
  • User: What is 21 divided by three?
  • Assistant: 52, my master.

Thing is, they only get some results right and hallucinate others. And you're doing billions of matrix multiplications just to calculate 2+1.

Sure. You can go to a construction site with only your one favorite tool. And use it for everything. And it's impressive to open a glass bottle of beer with a hammer and such. But I can guarantee you, you'll be slower digging that hole than the guys using a proper tool like an excavator.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

And: you don't solve any fundamental problems if you don't have the data for it. If the information isn't in your data, the network will start guessing and it will be horrible.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

That's not a translation problem, so LLMs are terrible for it.

Always use the right tool for the job. If there are a lot of nails to be hammered, you need a guy with a hammer.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

Yeah, that was kind of my point. I think the meme picture means people throw it at everything. No matter what. And the next logical thing would be to strip the computer scientist out of the picture. We have Github Copilot now ;) Let AI decide if AI is the proper tool.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

Translation, but not categorization. Trying to get reliable, and more importantly, predictibly accurate, metadata from an LLM without serious training is a pain. ML algorithms are far better for this but certainly take more brainpower (in my experience so far).

[-] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Modular design

[-] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Please, what is the established theory to create an n-1 dimensional space filling curve on the surface of an n-sphere?! I need to speed up my locality sensitive neural hash!

[-] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I don't see anything wrong in this picture. ML == funny!

"AI Casino" vs "old school nights banging heads on books"

Edit. Guys, it was a joke, do I really need to put /s?

this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
481 points (96.9% liked)

Programmer Humor

31331 readers
14 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS